Intertaining biology

The social consequences of pseudoscience are particularly devastating. Let us formulate the most important of them. For example, the baldness for many years made it impossible to discuss the feedback from the environment in the analysis of the origin and evolution of life. But in nature, processes are impossible without such feedback. The most important, purely scientific problem of search of extraterrestrial civilizations is discredited by fans of "flying saucers", UFOs and women who have become pregnant, ostensibly, from aliens...

Https://www.Pinterest.Ru/pin/739434832539629528/ The man who ruled the time there's no deception or hoax in that name. It is about a man who, using his amazing capabilities, could carry out the movement of, For example, an ordinary student in the XVII or XIX century...

Pseudoscience: Past and present Pseudoscience includes many branches, the most common of which are astrology, alchemy and numerology. Of course, these empirical teachings of the past have achieved certain results, but are now elements of the occult; for example, astrology gave rise to astronomy; alchemy gave rise to the development of chemistry and should be regarded as a historical stage of its development; numerology, which emerged during the boom of philosophy, mathematics and astrology, gave rise to some ideas of number theory...

Reasons for the influence of pseudoscience To draw a conclusion from the above, the definition of pseudoscience is the same, by whomever it is given. But the reasons for its appearance and growth are different. There are several reasons for its appearance and growth, and to some extent they are specific for Russia. "Information revolution" At the turn of the 20th-21st centuries, significant changes took place in the socio-cultural life of the population, the so-called freedom of choice appeared,...

Features of pseudoscience The main difference between pseudoscience and science is the uncritical use of new uncritical methods, questionable and often erroneous data and information, as well as the denial of the possibility of denial, while science is based on facts (verified information), verifiable methods and is constantly evolving, parting with the refuted theories and offering new ones. Here is what Vitaly Ginzburg, the Nobel Prize winner in physics of 2003 says: "False science is all sorts...