Добавить в корзинуПозвонить
Найти в Дзене
Alexander Dugin (Internacional)

If the US and Israel did not have such detailed information about every meeting, movement, and even the condition of Iran’s leaders, they

If the US and Israel did not have such detailed information about every meeting, movement, and even the condition of Iran’s leaders, they would still be at the helm of the state. The same applies to the leadership of Hamas and Hezbollah. In this picture, in Palantir’s manifesto, it is absolutely clear that we, along with China, are the next targets. We are defending our independence, trying to disconnect from this system and build a multipolar model that will at least limit the West’s omnipotence. And here, let’s be honest, we are losing this battle for sovereign digitalization and sovereign artificial intelligence by a landslide. In drone technology, in robotics, and in surveillance systems. In essence, we are only now approaching this problem and beginning to think about sovereign AI for Russia. But to build sovereign artificial intelligence, one must first possess natural intelligence—a genuine, independent mind capable of perceiving Russia as a unique civilization with its own t

В ответ на пост

If the US and Israel did not have such detailed information about every meeting, movement, and even the condition of Iran’s leaders, they would still be at the helm of the state. The same applies to the leadership of Hamas and Hezbollah.

In this picture, in Palantir’s manifesto, it is absolutely clear that we, along with China, are the next targets. We are defending our independence, trying to disconnect from this system and build a multipolar model that will at least limit the West’s omnipotence.

And here, let’s be honest, we are losing this battle for sovereign digitalization and sovereign artificial intelligence by a landslide. In drone technology, in robotics, and in surveillance systems. In essence, we are only now approaching this problem and beginning to think about sovereign AI for Russia. But to build sovereign artificial intelligence, one must first possess natural intelligence—a genuine, independent mind capable of perceiving Russia as a unique civilization with its own traditional values.

There are decrees on this subject, there is the will, but—where is the intelligence itself? If we do not live by our own minds, then we inevitably live by someone else’s. And this “foreign mind” today is not an abstraction; it is Palantir. Either we begin to develop a sovereign Russian philosophy and adapt technology to it, or we are doomed.

Right now, the system operates chaotically: someone invents a model, calls the ministry, and by the time approvals are granted, the technology is already obsolete. And if it doesn’t become obsolete, its copy instantly ends up in China, where everything is done faster and cheaper, only to be sold back to us later. We are beginning to fall tragically, critically behind in this race—both in AI and in intelligence in general. We are held back by inertia, managerial sluggishness, and an uncritical, almost blind faith in nuclear weapons as our sole salvation. We simply do not want to fully grasp the scale of what is currently unfolding in the West.

Note that Thiel and Karp, the authors of this manifesto and founders of Palantir, are multi-billionaires who effectively “created” both Musk and, as is now evident, Trump. But above all, they are philosophers. One began as a student of René Gérard, a leading French thinker; the other studied under Habermas. It is hard to say exactly what they took away from these teachings, and perhaps as philosophers they are mediocre, but what is fundamental is that they began precisely with ideas.

Ideas still rule the world. If we treat philosophy with arrogance, as some kind of unnecessary “nerdy” pursuit, assuming that technology will create and fix itself, we will miss the point—the understanding of what intelligence is. If we don’t have our own living intelligence, how can we create an artificial one?

At best, it will be a remake of Western consciousness, perhaps slightly diluted with Chinese models like DeepSeek or Qwen.

The problem of artificial intelligence is the problem of winning a war. And Palantir has long been waging this war against us, quite openly. This isn’t even about Russophobia: for these models, we are merely one of the obstacles. It is a mistake to think that they simply “hate” us—to them, we are collateral damage in the process of creating a global system of unipolar governance. They will step over us easily and without the slightest regret if we do not immediately come to our senses and get down to business in earnest. “Palantir” looms over us.

[1] [2]

READ HIS THOUGHTS HERE