Up to a certain point, Marxists, or at least the Soviet, Chinese, Cuban, Korean (the latter up to this day) projects, were a real muscle against hegemony. Today, however, left-liberal Marxism is an element of hegemony. We cannot continue to seriously rely on Marxism as a counter-hegemony. Nor can nationalism act as a force for counter-hegemony – we see how easily liberals break the system of nationalism: the "righties" either do not exist, or they dance to the tune of hegemony. Any form of Caesarism is not an alternative to hegemony: neither Putin's, nor Trump's, nor European populism, nor Orbán, nor any of the modern conservatisms, nor China – all of them are not counter-hegemony in the full sense of the word. They are Caesarism of varying degrees, adjustments of the elements of hegemony to local needs. This is a temporary model. Gramsci was able to describe the modern world with all its contradictions most accurately. To describe the situation in Europe, Latin America, Russia, China,