Найти в Дзене

How do not loose thinking you win? (11 November 2016)

Indulgence to exploitations of the past.
How to increase productive power of science and development in 100 times. And the way to go away from mainspring of life-support economic contradictions.

Imagine, you have 2 options. Both are physically possible at any moment of time and any situation.
But in any moment of time one is slow by results. Another, only one of them, is much more perspective to all what you want: live longer, power the nature, being friend with the cleverest, bravest and strongest people ever possible.
Options are different.
And they would require different behavior to achieve. Among the results, there are structural and organizational difference.
Many details are foreclosed for an opposite option. And you need to know, what to choose. Because you gonna lose on wrong choice. You, may be, stay alive, but weight of lost profit would be self-humiliating.

We would not take the very stupid case, would not suggest you (or your parents and grands) could not make estimation and choose right way. Let you (all you) had chosen right, and did right. And you just continue do the same again and again.
Is it still possible you lose?
Yes.
It is possible to lose if you do not expect changes in the world. If you miss the world principal change.

There is the change I see we are all missing.
(Even a few ones, who already know now about. Have to miss all together in great man-river flowing another way.)

It was all simple “500” years old. See a) column on picture.

We are in total lack of resources and productivity. V – is a value of public production.

The only trick to make someone go ahead – exploit. Exploit by agreement or by force. Concentrate resources on few ones. This is explanation of exploitations longevity and source of it power in centuries.
Divide this old V for all and you got nobody has enough.

See someone low-cultural? Check the level of public resources falling on him. You may be impressed, how much he could take from that he has.

You see life-support economic contradictions, fight for the better place pushes mainsprings of conflicts. But you have nothing to do. It is the price for moving forward. You need resources concentration to get enough.
(And this is an explanation and excuse for exploiters of the past.)
And all R&D is under push of social hierarchy and economic contradictions spring. Some time they push so hard, that goal is totally taken away from objective natural needs.

But let’s update the picture with results of labor-productivity and culture growth. See b) column.
You’ll see, that someday (may be today, but may be yesterday already), the cause to push mainspring of economic conflict is less and less valid. One day it is no more valid any more.
At some level (see possible solution project in column b)), you may finally extend the top quality of life and freedom of action to all. (Just do not forget to educate and teach young the rules of the hostel, so they would not come as a monkey with a grenade).
This is the way to increase productivity power of science and development in 100 times. (Comparing to 1% of population now.)

Every level of culture has the appropriate set of task to solve.
Put people on the highest level, reproduce high culture, if you wish people see that is appropriate to see there and want they to go to solve the same you are trying to solve.
There are so many problems visible around, so we need a real army of people solving the problem. To have a hope to ever solve it all.

I do not put a spring of life-support economic contradictions here. You may mention, that social hierarchy is not here too.
And it is necessary to figure out, do you really need it? Is it that you could not leave without? Do you still need to handle all its negative sides, up to risk to disappear from the face of Earth? What would you prefer, if you have to choose between higher place in social hierarchy and place in higher future?
Everyone may live good already. Why fight for life-supporting?
Do you need motivation? Look around, open your eyes, time and nature, social dependency have enough motivation, no need any ‘special people’ to help them.
Of course, you might need more resources for you project and extra-wishes? Take the necessary resources together with people, convince when to do, unite a command and produce all the necessary together. On this way you’ll be able to get true side estimation (remember, you have millions people around, of highest possible level of culture). And could come back in time from bad ideas (As bad idea I certainly mean something non-humanistic, for example. You need all these people here anyway, to support the very-artificial high-productive life-supporting machine of public production. To share life-supporting efforts: more people, less per man. Every one of us needs each other for that purpose. Break the machine and go back on war of 500 years ago. So good solutions could not be non-humanistic anymore.) And everyone would prefer to share, just give out, results (to move this great R&D machine to the next step).

The only group, which is reasonable to keep limited in rights, are young (till they pass the education and go through all the stages of cultural evolution to mature cultural level). Sorry, but appropriate machine of public production here is a very, very complicated thing. Too complicated and expensive to be broken.

Now the very important question.

We still stay in society structured for 500 years old reality. ‘Take and lose’ lots of resources, which should not be taken.

Because now the society structure should be different.

So, what would you prefer? Is it higher place in social hierarchy with results we have now or place in higher future with results we could only dream?

We would not be able to get up in new reality tomorrow. But we may go, if we see the way. And be there as soon as possible.

Original source: http://worldcrisis.ru/crisis/2508932

Publishing date: 11 November 2016

Примечание о публикации.
----------------------------------------------------
Автор: Драницына Александра

Отказ автора от ограничений на использование материала.

Поддержать автора:
- трудовой вклад в проект (свяжитесь с автором для координации)
- счет в Сбербанке 40817810042002326713
- подписаться на канал (перераспределение выплат платформы в пользу автора)

Благодарности/ссылки: М.В.Попов, А.В. Золотов, Г.Г. Малинецкий, Г.С. Бискэ, Д.А. Медведев, Ю.Л. Крузе, Л. Галкин и др.