The family as socio-psychological integrity has a socializing effect on the individual through normative and of information influence. The more cohesive the family, the more effective it is a regulatory impact. The cohesion we are talking about here, implies value unity, familial and family priority, the subordination of an individual's interests to family norms. However, if this one the priority is absolutized, the formation of conformist behaviour, where the individual does nothing without constantly looking at the dominant family members.
Lack of cohesion and family disorganization open doors to the outside world of family influences. Normative influences in general, and family influences in particular action through standards, patterns of behaviour, the knowledge of which does not allow each time to look for new solutions in standard situations, and to behave as if automatically, by the accepted socio-cultural environment and with personality-learned patterns. Family rituals to the greatest extent are related to the norm-samples, as the degree of standardization, the repeatability of everyday family life situations is extremely high.
On the contrary, non-standard situations are regulated by standards - the principles that determine the value direction of actions. Normative impact in the family is accepted by the individual to preserve your interpersonal status and get approval from others. This, however, is not means that an individual necessarily shares the opinions he or she accepts. When a family's influence is communicated, the individual shares the family's picture of the world accepts it as true but does not seek the approval of others.
Families "traditional" and "modern" do not differ among themselves as carriers of normative or informational influence, and in terms of their ratio to participate in the socialization process. The weakening of family cohesion reduces the power of the family's normative. The impact, reliability and sustainability of the impact as a source of information for an individual.
Of particular interest is the attempt to consider the consequences of direct and indirect deprivation (isolation) of the child from the family. In this regard, attention should be paid to the socialization mechanism that is inherent in only to the family and not to all other socialization agents.
It is about the formation of a flexible family switchability of the child from the of "among their own" behaviour to the "among strangers" code and back. The more cohesive the family, the stronger the family WE are, the clearer the signs and the attributes of "we're our own." Family socialization is defined as the process of human assimilation role relations in the family, family values with a view to their reproduction, and is also the self-development and self-realization of man in society.
Family is a complex sociocultural phenomenon. Its specificity and uniqueness in are that it focuses almost every aspect of the human and reaches all levels of social practice: from the individual to the social-historical, from the material to the spiritual.
Three interrelated blocks can be conventionally identified in the family structure of a relationship: 1 - natural-biological, i.e. sexual and blood-bearing; 2-economic, i.e. relations based on household, household, family property; 3-spiritual-psychological, moral-aesthetic, related with feelings of marital and parental love, with raising children, with cares about the elderly parents, with moral standards. Only the totality of these links in their unity creates a family as a special social phenomenon because natural proximity cannot be considered as a family
Men and women who are not legally protected and are not bound community and child-rearing, since this is nothing more than cohabitation. Economic cooperation and mutual assistance of close people, If they are not based on marriage and kinship, they are also not an element of family relationships, but only business partnerships. And finally, the spiritual The community of men and women is limited to friendship if the relationship between they don't take the family form of development.
As we can see, only the totality of these relations within a single whole is a family. These relationships are very heterogeneous, contradictory, and are sometimes incompatible because they express the spiritual and material, the sublime and the everyday.
to be continued in the next part