By Stephen F. Grinstead, Dr. AD, LMFT, ACRPS, CADC-II “Я не хочу быть здесь, и я не понимаю, почему я
должен с тобой разговаривать!"
В основе сопротивления лежит автоматический
и бессознательный защитный механизм — отрицание. Эта
система отрицания защищает зависимых от столкновения с какой-то болезненной реальностью в их жизни. На самом деле, эта система служила очень полезной цели в прошлом зависимого, но сегодня причиняет больше боли и проблем, чем решает. Есть три важнейших шага, которые необходимо...
Еще одна характеристика зависимой личности — ригидность, под которой понимается негибкость, тугоподвижность всей психической деятельности и, в частности, установок, экспектаций (ожиданий), стилей поведения, осмысления действительности. По мнению Г. В. Залевского(1980), психическая ригидность включает в себя склонность к широкому спектру фиксированных форм поведения и неспособность при объективной необходимости изменить мнение, отношение, установку, мотивы, модус переживания и т. п. Ригидность — трудность, с которой изменяются установившиеся навыки (habits) перед лицом новых требований (по Р. Кеттеллу)...
Основываясь на данных исследований, наркоман проходит следующие 11 шагов, прежде чем он / она, наконец, добирается до места, где, по его мнению, у него / нее нет другого выбора, кроме как снова употреблять наркотики. Шаг 1: Нездоровые эмоции Шаг 2: Отрицание Шаг 3: Компульсивное поведение Шаг 4: Триггеры Шаг 5: Внутренний хаос Шаг 6: Внешняя суматоха Шаг 7: Потеря контроля Шаг 8: Залипание мыслях Шаг 9: Ситуации высокого риска Шаг 10: РЕЦИДИВ Шаг 11: Последствия рецидива Профилактика рецидивов заключается в том, чтобы узнать, каковы ваши триггеры и как справляться с тягой. Определите ваши личные...
Автор: Теренс Т. Горски Постострый абстинентный синдром (также называемый PAWS) - это совокупность симптомов, которые возникают у выздоравливающих наркоманов и алкоголиков. Симптомы PAWS обычно начинают проявляться между семью и 14 днями после острого периода абстиненции и обычно достигают пика между тремя и шестью месяцами после начала абстиненции. Острая абстиненция проявляется в основном физическими симптомами. Когда организм испытывает первоначальный шок от отказа от психоактивных веществ, наркоман может испытывать целый ряд физических реакций, включая дрожь, рвоту, озноб, боль в мышцах и...
2 года назад
Сopyright Diana Rodgers, RD
2 года назад
CONTINUED The second meta-analysis was published in 2017 and reviewed 96 studies. Although they found slight relative reductions in death from heart disease and cancer in vegetarians and vegans compared with omnivores, they found no difference in total mortality. The authors note that the majority of studies reviewed showed bias. Mostly from healthy user bias as most vegans/vegetarians tend to be just generally more health conscious than meat eaters so they tend to smoke less, drink less and exercise more which leads to better health and is more likely to be the difference in the outcomes. Still no overall mortality benefits were found. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26853923/ I have more. Way more but this is more than I know you will read anyway since you are not making an argument out of rationality but out of feelings and zealotry. Copyright https://www.facebook.com/groups/577085572484743/user/100064559956924/
2 года назад
Science time with vegans. I ( https://www.facebook.com/groups/577085572484743/user/100064559956924/ ) managed to get myself involved in a "discussion" with some vegans over a post showing some misleading info about eggs vs tofu which inferred that it was better than eggs. It isn't. While you will never change a vegans mind, because they are eating this way not out of a desire for health for the most part but an ideology/religion, it is always an opportunity to showcase their derangement on nutrition to others that are open minded. One vegan at least attempted to post some "science" but fortunately for me he isn't up to the task on my scale. He only posted news articles talking about studies and we know how the media does with spinning a narrative. I took some time to post some actual science. Here is my response to his attempt. If you want science I will link you to actual research papers. Not opinions from news media who can and do twist things to suit their own narrative. This is a collection of science that shows that vegan diets are not better for humans and meat is not the evil that you make it out to be. It is actually the reason we evolved to be the beings we are. Meat and Nicotinamide: A Causal Role in Human Evolution, History, and Demographics https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5417583/ The Critical Role Played by Animal Source Foods in Human (Homo) Evolution https://academic.oup.com/jn/article/133/11/3886S/4818038... Potential impact of the digestible indispensable amino acid score as a measure of protein quality on dietary regulations and health https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5914309/ The Health Food Shoppers Study - What did the researchers find? In a 1999 analysis of the data, both vegetarians and omnivores in the health food store group lived longer than people in the general population—not surprising given their higher level of health consciousness—but there was no survival difference between vegetarians or omnivores. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8842068/ The Oxford Vegetarians Study - As in the Health Food Shoppers Study, both vegetarians and health-conscious omnivores had lower risk of early death than the general population, but there was no difference in lifespan between the two groups. https://www.bmj.com/content/308/6945/1667 EPIC-Oxford Cohort - In this study, researchers found that the risk of death for both vegetarians/vegans and omnivores was 52 percent lower than in the general population—similar to findings from the two studies above. However, there was no difference in mortality between vegetarians and omnivores. https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/article/89/5/1613S/4596950 Heidelberg Study - This study found that vegetarians had slightly higher (10 percent) total mortality than healthy omnivores. What’s more, the data suggested that non-dietary factors played a much greater role in predicting lifespan than diet https://aacrjournals.org/.../Lifestyle-Determinants-and... The 45 and Up Australian Study - What were the results? They found no significant difference in total mortality between vegetarians and omnivores. There was also no difference in mortality between vegetarians, pesco-vegetarians, and semi-vegetarians. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28040519/ Do you know what Meta-analysis are? They are a review of many individual studies. Lets look at some of these. They carry a large amount of weight because they look at large amounts of data at one time. The first was done in 2014. It found no difference in total mortality between vegetarians/vegans and omnivores. 8 studies reviewed with 183,000 participants. https://www.sciencedirect.com/.../abs/pii/S016752731401290X TO BE CONTINUED
Reference to 2019 study in the International Journal of Epidemiology entitled Diet and colorectal cancer in UK Biobank: a prospective study.
2019 study in the International Journal of Epidemiology entitled...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30919883/
Abstract
Background: Certain vaccines, such as Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG), have nonspecific effects, which modulate innate immune responses and lead to protection against mortality from unrelated infections (trained immunity)...