A global humane social project for the nravstvennoral path of humanity
Автор: Kim Ji Man
Опубликовано: 17 ноября 2025
A global humane social project for the nravstvennoral path of humanity
Nravstvennoral - this is compliance with the global ecological principle (GEP) in behavior - a person does not harm a person and the environment.
Antinravstvennoral – the process of distributing public goods, in which society is harmed, the social, physical and biological foundations of human life are destroyed. Inequality arises. Antinravstvennoral policies lead to social catastrophe.
Antinravstvennoral - an act as a result of which harm was caused to a citizen.
GLOBAL ETHICS
AS THE BASIS OF GLOBAL GOVERNANCE
Before talking about global governance, we need to define global ethics. This is what the military-scientific school of V.A. Chigirev and P.I. Yunatskevich claims. It offers a new ethic for the way out of the crisis of all world systems, connected with global ecology: man should not harm man and the environment.
The vocabulary of heads of state, transnational and national corporations, and international organizations includes the utilitarian ethic of seeking profitable deals.
However, relationships, including trade relationships, built on pragmatism alone (utilitarianism, monetarism, the primacy of the material over the spiritual) lead to the collapse of all deals. The scale of the crisis in business relations begins to grow when sociopaths (people without conscience and compassion) and psychopaths (people with obvious character defects, because of which they harm everyone around them) sneak into politics. They destroy all international treaties and agreements, do not fulfill their obligations, betray and sell each other out.
The global market is losing stability. Investment portfolios can no longer be insured. Each market participant must now find ways to insure their contracts and build new logistics. The stability of the economy has been reduced. The unpredictability of the behavior of global market regulators is growing. The global financial market began to need ethical regulation on a new basis. Mistrust has arisen towards a number of global currencies. Former allies have begun to harm each other.
Those who propose to behave according to the rules, change these rules themselves every day. Therefore, an initiative has arisen to form a new mechanism of global governance. However, without defining its ethical foundations, such a mechanism will not be created. It will be talked down, since it is impossible to restore trust in each other without forming joint intangible assets built on the basis of a global ethical principle: a person should not harm a person and the environment. Also, global governance requires a technology built on a method adequate to the object of governance.
In order to create a mechanism of global governance, to restore trust between former allies in the West and East, North and South, to stabilize the global economy, world and national markets, the military-scientific school of V.A. Chigirev and P.I. Yunatskevich has developed and offers global ethics. It includes a global ecological principle and a discursive-evaluative method.
Global ecological principle (GEP): a person should not harm himself, other people and the environment.
Discourse-evaluative method (DEM) is a method of regulating social relations based on group expert and mass assessment when discussing socially significant decisions.
Eight billion (8,000,000,000) citizens of our planet Earth experience an acute shortage of justice, they want to establish moral order so that each person is protected from harm, social parasitism. The facts of mass violation of human rights and freedoms, the aggravation of inequality and the elimination of the middle class have shown everyone the imperfection of laws, courts, law enforcement practice. The existing system of international and national law can and should be supplemented with new ethics, which is based on the global ecological principle and the ecological nravstvennoral rule of three C (III-C) that follows from it:
C1- Don't harm yourself!
C2- Don't harm your neighbor!! Otherwise your neighbor will harm you.
C3- Don't harm the environment!!! Otherwise the environment will harm you.
In order not to harm yourself, you need not to harm other people and the environment - that is, to become ecological. Do not harm yourself - here and now - and you will ensure the ecology of the planet, your home and social environment. This guarantees a bright future for yourself and your descendants.
Ecology is about not causing harm to oneself, other people, and the environment. Others determine the life path of each person. They evaluate and discuss any citizen or (and) boss. If others establish that this specific citizen or (and) boss causes harm, then there is NO trust in him. Therefore, a saboteur who has lost trust immediately becomes an object of influence of others. This influence can be different, dangerous and even deadly. To avoid harm from others, a saboteur can save himself by becoming more ecological, that is, harmless to the environment and other people. For self-preservation of himself and the environment, it is important for him to stop harming others, so as not to harm himself in the end!!!
There is no bright, happy future for everyone. Everyone feels it – both rich and poor. The situation of everyone in the situation of loss of the ethical regulator, moral crisis is unstable. Harm can suddenly happen to anyone. Accumulation of money only attracts the negative social energy of the masses. Everything is possible here: lethal redistribution of property; robbery according to all the rules of jurisprudence; reprisals against descendants; desecration of treasures and wealth of entire generations of wealthy families, clans and families.
All big bosses are in a semantic, existential dead end. They are tired of constant intrigues, their own tyranny, they are fed up with their impunity, they feel the inevitability of their own catastrophe and the violation of the integrity of their physical shell. The way out of the existential dead end is the new global ethics - technology (GET).
Therefore, the need for a universal unifying idea and technology for its implementation has come. And such a global ideology-technology has been created – global ethics: people do not harm each other and the environment; they protect each other and the environment.
Global ethics is Nravstvennoi Path of Humanity. Both the poor and the rich, both the servant and the boss are ready to follow it, without harming each other; creating for each other.
If you have not followed the ecological moral path, then there will be few who will come to see you off on your final journey.
The individual, personal brake that holds one back from the desire to follow the ecological moral path and save oneself from harm caused by others are the following subjective reasons:
1) greed (remorse of greed);
2) envy of the one walking ahead on the ecological moral path;
3) mental modesty.
They (greed, envy, intellectual modesty) are the reasons for causing harm to oneself, neighbors, and the environment.
They are also the reasons for harmful social parasitic, as well as sociopathic and psychopathic behavior. We propose the main condition for the onset of global peace - a new global ethics - technology.
Global Ethics - Technology (GET)
Global Ethics Technology (GET) includes the idea of non-harm by man to man and the environment, freely accepted and shared by the majority of the population of the Earth; and the associated procedure for measuring the environmental friendliness of the leaders of global management systems on planet Earth.
Environmental friendliness is measured in the process of environmental assessment. As a result, each leader of the global management system receives an individual ecoindices (EI), which is constantly adjusted in the process of discursive practices.
Individual ecoindices are used by citizens all over the world to protect the environment and ensure the safety of social relations.
Foundations of the new global ethics - technology (GET):
Global ecological principle (GEP): a person should not harm himself, other people and the environment.
Global Ethical Nravstvennoral Principle (GENP): a person must behave in such a way as not to cause harm to himself, other people and the environment.
Discursive-evaluative method (DEM) is a method of regulating social relations based on group expert and mass evaluation when discussing socially significant decisions.
Nravstvennoral rule III-C: do not harm yourself (C1), your neighbors (C2), or your environment (C3) by thought, word, or deed; create for yourself, your neighbors, and your environment by thought, word, and deed.
The technology of new global ethics is based on the discursive-evaluative method (DEM), which consists of organizing broad participation of citizens in the discussion and evaluation of socially significant decisions from the positions of GEP, GENP, III-C.
Global governance, market and peace
Global governance, the market and the world will become stable when everyone begins to follow the moral rule: create - do no harm.
There is harm - there is no trust. And when there is no trust, there is no governance, no market, and no peace. Therefore, the basis of global governance, the foundation of the global market and peace, public peace, the stability of socio-economic relations, world and national currencies, human health is the social process described by the formula:
DEM + III-C = Global Management, Market and Peace
Any capital strives for safe development. This is impossible without global ethics. The demand for safety, insurance of investment projects and portfolios is guaranteed only by global ethics – technology (GET):
DEM + GET (III-C)
Organizing and participating in this creative process will allow the process of global governance to be given an ecological, nravstvennoral, coordinating principle. This is the only way to stabilize the global market and restore trust in world currencies, establish moral and legal order, stop bloody wars, stop the killing of man by man in the present, and thus guarantee a bright Future for everyone.
Global ethics will stabilize the world monetary system and logistics. Sustainable growth of all economies will begin, especially in underdeveloped countries. The well-being of the world's population will rise. The rich will become richer, the poor will stop living in poverty. Conflicts will move from the lethal plane to a non-lethal humane confrontation. Instead of hitting the opponent on the skull, they will hit his arguments. Everything will be regulated by general discussion and assessment from the position of the global ecological principle: man must not harm man and the environment.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF THE DECLARATION
"The Nravstvennoral Path of Humanity"
Attempts to improve the quality of life, ignoring the global nravstvennoral principle, lead to a reduction in its duration.
V.A. Chigirev
People of all countries of the world stand for world peace, which can and must be maintained through nravstvennoral education and training of citizens of all countries of the world. The basis of this process is the discursive-evaluative method and the nravstvennoral rule III-C:
The discursive-evaluative method (DEM) is a group expert and mass ethical assessment of socially significant decisions.
Nravstvennoral rule III-C (Three C) – do not harm yourself (C1), your neighbors (C2), or the environment (C3) by thought, word, or deed; create for yourself, your neighbors, and the environment by thought, word, and deed.
The establishment of an ethical and legal ban on the violation of nravstvennoral rules will become possible if every citizen takes part in the international volunteer movement " Nravstvennoi Solidarity" and also supports by personal example the global project for all humanity, developed and proposed to the world by our international community of the Academy of Ecosocial Technologies.
Peace will come when everyone begins to follow the nravstvennoral rule: create without harming.
There is harm – there is no trust. And when there is no trust, there is no peace. Therefore, the foundation of universal peace and public tranquility, the stability of social relations and human health is the social process described by the formula:
DEM + III-C = peace and progress
The organization of this creative process and participation in it will allow us to establish nravstvennoral and legal order, stop bloody wars, stop the killing of man by man in the present and, thus, guarantee a bright Future for everyone.
In this regard, citizens and organizations of all countries of the world are invited to support the declaration “The Nravstvennoi Path of Humanity”.
The declaration is based on the following publications:
Declaration of an Open Civil Society
https://ast.social/o-nas/ast-home/527-deklaratsija-otkrytogo-grazhdanskogo-obschestva.html
Ecological (nravstvennoral) manifesto
https://in.ast.social/menu-news/628-ekologicheskij-nravstvennyj-manifest.html
https://www.pik.ast.social/menu-news/12-ipsiy003.html
GLOSSARY
Anomic depression characterized by the following features: cultural and nravstvennoral confusion; despondency; defeatism; nravstvennoral disorientation.
Smart and cultured people suffer especially from defeatism. They are the first to break. Anxiety develops into fear. They are afraid of everything. Depression, anger, aggression, helplessness increase. This deprives educated people of faith in themselves. Desubjectivation occurs, the so-called "death of the subject". Everyone becomes the object of manipulation by parasites, sociopaths, psychopaths (people without conscience and nravstvennoral).
The destruction of the basic value (nravstvennoral) is carried out with the help of the ideology of money, the instillation of the destructive idea of universal venality, the demonstration of an example of irresponsibility and tyranny of robbers of budget funds, imitators of the social functions of the state.
ACG – administrative criminal groups, a particularly dangerous form of criminal community formed by officials of public authorities on the basis of a selfish conspiracy.
Antinravstvennoral – the process of distributing public goods, in which society is harmed, the social, physical and biological foundations of human life are destroyed. Inequality arises. Antinravstvennoral policies lead to social catastrophe.
Antinravstvennoral - an act as a result of which harm was caused to a citizen.
BEST - blocking ecosocial technology, allows to prohibit harmful actions of social subjects by visualizing negative civil consent.
Harm – a violation of the conditions of normal life that is felt and experienced by a person.
Global ethics is Nravstvennoral Path of Humanity. Both the poor and the rich, both the servant and the boss are ready to follow it, without harming each other; creating for each other.
Nravstvennoral - this is compliance with the global ecological principle (GEP) in behavior - a person does not harm a person and the environment.
Global Ethics Technology (GET) includes the idea of non-harm by man to man and the environment, freely accepted and shared by the majority of the population of the Earth; and the associated procedure for measuring the environmental friendliness of the leaders of global management systems on planet Earth.
Global ecological principle (GEP): a person should not harm himself, other people and the environment.
Global Ethical Nravstvennoral Principle (GENP): a person must behave in such a way as not to cause harm to himself, other people and the environment.
Civil consent (positive or negative) is the opinion of citizens, expressed in an evaluative form regarding the social actions of social subjects.
Civil (social) cowardice– this is the failure to fulfill civil obligations to protect one’s rights and freedoms, as well as to protect the rights and freedoms of other citizens due to anxiety, fear, and fear of punishment from those who violate these rights.
Cowardice leads to the degeneration of society, the collapse of the state, the loss of rights, freedoms and life itself.
Prevention of civil cowardice is carried out with the help of ecosocial technology.
Destructive ideology – this is the cultivation of the priority of the material over the spiritual: antinravstvennoral, permissiveness, egoism, faith in money as in God.
The Destructive Ideology of Money is based on the priority of the material over the spiritual in human consciousness and behavior. Money is used as a tool of oppression and exploitation. The return of money to the function of an accessible tool for creation is carried out through a broad discussion and evaluation of financial decisions using a new ethic: financial decisions should not harm people and the environment.
Discursive-evaluative method (DEM) is a method of regulating social relations based on group expert and mass assessment when discussing socially significant decisions.
Spirituality — is work for other people, in which a person gives them more than he takes in return. Work for the benefit of other people spiritualizes a person, becomes his spiritual foundation.
Spiritual and nravstvennoral values – a person’s attitude towards himself, other people and the environment, formed as a result of training and education, characterized as harmless and creative.
Nravstvennoral Index – a numerical indicator of harm from social actions or inactions of a subject. It is formed in the process of ethical evaluation.
Informal justice - the process of establishing justice based on the discursive-evaluative method. All legal and judicial decisions are discussed at all stages and assessed by experts and specialists from nravstvennoral and legal positions: do no harm, follow the spirit, not the letter of the law.
Collective – a social group in which a nravstvennoral atmosphere has been formed, characterized by the following features: internal unity of ideas, goals, and objectives; joint mode of activity; mutual assistance and support for each other according to the principle of “one for all and all for one”; self-government, where each member of the team plays the role of an executor in solving one problem and a leader in solving another problem; the opportunity for each member of the team to gain authority in the form of general recognition of social and professional compliance with the position or role held; friendship, calmness, and confidence in the future of each member of the team; constructive behavior of team members, ensuring their mental and physical health; a sense of pride in belonging to the team; joint discussion and adoption of management decisions.
Mass assessment of professional compliance is a method of assessing the suitability of a specialist for the position held, based on the assessment by citizens of a particular specialist by using a binary scale: corresponds to the position held; does not correspond to the position held.
Binary assessment becomes correct in group assessment of personality and collective assessment of personality by persons who know each other from joint activities. A mass assessment of a public figure, on whose activities the standard of living of citizens depends, is also correct. If this level is growing and they do not feel any harm from the manager, then the assessment will be as follows: suits the position held. If citizens feel a decrease in their standard of living, then their assessment will be as follows: “does not suit the position held”. Rotation of specialists and managers based on the results of their mass assessment of professional suitability helps ensure the safety of society.
Negative civil consent – is a consolidated condemning opinion of many social subjects regarding social actions or inactions of other social subjects. It is an instrument of citizens, society and the state to ensure the priority of the spiritual over the material, to protect and strengthen spiritual and nravstvennoral values.
Nravstvennoral pedagogy (NP) or ecopedagogy (EP) is a practical pedagogical science about the methods of teaching and education, supplemented by a discursive-evaluative method.
Nravstvennoral policy – this is such a distribution of public (not only material) goods, in which the nravstvennoral rule III-C is observed: do not harm yourself (C1), neighbors (C2), the environment (C3) either by thought, word or deed; create for yourself, neighbors, the environment by thought, word, deed.
Nravstvennoral Rule III-C: do not harm yourself (C1), your neighbors (C2), your environment (C3) either by thought, word or deed; create for yourself, your neighbors, your environment by thought, word and deed.
Nravstvennoral principle - do not harm yourself, others, the environment. It is realized in the nravstvennoral rule "Three C" (III-C): do not harm yourself, your neighbors, the environment, neither by thought, nor by word, nor by deed; create for yourself, your neighbors, the environment by thought, word and deed.
Nravstvennoral Path of Humanity – harmless and creative activity of people for each other and the environment, joint discussion and implementation of decisions made.
New Ethics (Global Ethics, New Global Ethics) – ethics-technology, the use of which allows to give human relations an ecological character, reflecting the global ecological principle (GEP): a person should not harm a person and the environment.
Foundations of the new ethics:
Global Ecological Principle (GEP): a person should not harm himself, other people and the environment.
Global Ethical Nravstvennoral Principle (GENP): A person should behave in such a way as not to cause harm to himself, other people and the environment.
The discursive-evaluative method (DEM) is a method of regulating social relations based on group expert and mass assessment when discussing socially significant decisions.
Nravstvennoral rule III-C: do not harm yourself (C1), your neighbors (C2), or your environment (C3) by thought, word, or deed; create for yourself, your neighbors, and your environment by thought, word, and deed.
The technology of new ethics is based on the discursive-evaluative method (DEM), which consists of organizing the broad participation of citizens in the discussion and evaluation of socially significant decisions from the positions of GEP, GENP, III-C.
Nravstvennoral disability is a social problem created by a person who lacks conscience and empathy, harming themselves, others, and the environment.
To be classified as nravstvennoral disabled, a person must meet two conditions:
1. Have a persistent behavioral disorder (harm to themselves, others, or the environment).
2. Have completely or partially lost conscience and empathy for others.
The first degree of nravstvennoral disability is when a person harms themselves (suicidal behavior, social cowardice).
The second degree of nravstvennoral disability is when a person harms neighbors and others. This includes murder, other criminal activity, fraud, drug addiction, arbitrariness and selfishness, hedonism, parasitism, and antinravstvennorality.
The third degree of nravstvennoral l disability is when a person harms the environment and their country (betrayal and betrayal of the Fatherland, technologies, products, and living conditions harmful to human health, and maintaining an antinravstvennoral atmosphere on planet Earth).
Nravstvennoral disability has a destructive impact on a person's relationships with themselves, others, and the environment. From a legal perspective, nravstvennorally disabled individuals become organizers and participants in various crimes. They lack compassion for the victims of crimes and are not tormented by conscience, as such a feeling is unknown to them.
Social feedback – the response of citizens to the influences exerted on them by social actors.
Policy – is a system of social relations regarding the distribution of public goods.
Priority of the spiritual over the material - the process of human creative labor.
Prevention of mental modesty is carried out by means of a mass assessment of the professional suitability of specialists and management personnel. Based on the results of the assessment, adequate personnel decisions are made on the rotation or retraining of a person who is professionally unsuitable for the position held.
Psychopathy – socially dangerous mental illnesses accompanied by pronounced character defects that encourage a person to harm others and create unbearable conditions for interaction.
Change of worldview paradigm – the process of transition to a nravstvennoral worldview based on the recognition of nravstvennorality and antinravstvennorality, harmful and constructive, spiritual and selfish. A nravstvennoral worldview implements ethical self-regulation of human behavior within the boundaries set by nravstvennoral rule III-C: do no harm to oneself, neighbors, or the environment, either by thought, word, or deed; create for oneself, neighbors, and the environment by thought, word, and deed.
Conscience – an ethical regulator of human and citizen behavior, his internal attitude. It is formed in the process of nravstvennoral education with the help of other citizens and organizations that correct the behavior and self-esteem of the individual.
Creation – socially useful activity, during which a person gives to others more than he receives in return.
Social filtering – a procedure for group, collective and mass assessment of the nravstvennorality and professional suitability of personnel, serving as a basis for adequate personnel decisions. Aimed at ensuring the sustainability and reliability of the system of public administration and local self-government.
Social action – the result of the activity of a social subject: intentions, statements, decisions and actions affecting the interests of several (two or more) citizens.
Social Conformity – this is the consistency of human behavior with the new ethics associated with global ecology: a person should not harm a person and the environment.
Socially parasitic structure – an organization whose entire effort is aimed at obtaining funds to support its own existence. A characteristic feature of such a structure is the imitation of its main activity in solving urgent social problems.
Social parasitism – a way of existence of a social subject guided by the idea of personal gain at any cost. A consequence of the cult of money, double standards, discrepancy between words and deeds. A social parasite lives at the expense of other social subjects, without participating in their creative activity or imitating such participation.
Social process – this is a way of existence of a social subject, its life activity, carried out in interaction with other social subjects.
Social subject – this is both an individual and groups of people in their associations, organizations, enterprises; this is also the administration, government and civil society as a whole.
Sociopathy – a socially dangerous disease, accompanied by the loss of conscience and empathy for other people.
Technology of changing the worldview paradigm is based on the discursive-evaluative method (DEM), which consists of organizing broad participation of citizens in the discussion and evaluation of socially significant decisions from the positions of GEP, GENP, III-C.
Threat – potential harm to human life.
Intellectual modesty (Cognitive disability) manifests itself in a person if he has not been instilled with the habit of reading and thinking, he has not mastered socially significant knowledge, he has not developed skills and abilities relevant for socialization. Has a minimal vocabulary, does not reveal his intellectual defects in everyday speech. Imitates his literacy with superficial judgments. Needs individual training and education. Upon receiving such an education, he can overcome intellectual modesty and become a successful specialist and a competent leader.
Ethical Rating Scale (binary, multi-point) is a method of digitizing and visually representing the assessment of the level of nravstvennorality of a social subject. Ethical assessment scales can be used by citizens, organizations and state and local authorities to organize ethical assessment of social subjects.
Ecosocial technology for preventing lethal wars consists in creating a discursive-evaluative practice of identifying universal enemies of humanity (sociopaths, social parasites), who, in order to maintain their tyranny, antinravstvennorality and irresponsibility, as well as to retain the captured power and wealth, incite local and global lethal wars, push people, nations and states into bloody massacres under various kinds of demagogic and provocative slogans.
Ecosocial technologies (EST) is a set of techniques for applying the discursive-evaluative method when discussing and evaluating a specific socially significant decision with the participation of experts, specialists and the masses of citizens.
Ecopedagogy – practical pedagogical science on teaching and nravstvennoral education, supplemented by a discursive-evaluative method.
Ethical assessment – is an assessment by citizens of the nravstvennorality or antinravstvennorality of the actions of other citizens and organizations in order to block the consequences of antinravstvennoral behavior.
DECLARATION OF THE NRAVSTVENNORAL PATH OF HUMANITY
Developed by the Academy of Ecosocial Technologies
Approved January 31, 2024
Secretariat of the Academy of Ecosocial Technologies
Offered to the world community for support and use in the interests of ensuring global security
Discussed and proposed by the Green Helmets Peacekeeping Forces to the entire world community on July 31, 2025, Minsk, Republic of Belarus
Supported by the public of Egypt, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, Israel, Finland, Turkey, the Philippines, the Kingdom of Thailand, France, Abkhazia, Serbia, Belarus, Vietnam, Mongolia, Japan, Laos, Republic of Korea, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Philippines, Slovakia, Guinea, Moldova, Uzbekistan
AAlsoRussian Orthodox Church, society "Inkeri, the Supreme Buddhist Council in Russia and Eastern Europe,
The International Union of Women, the Association of Business Women, the Peacekeeping Forces of the Cossack Guard,
International Peacekeeping Corps "Green Helmets", BRICS organizations
The Embassies of the People's Republic of China, Mongolia, Japan, South Korea, the Republic of Belarus, India, Afghanistan, Iran, Uzbekistan, the Russian Federation and Turkmenistan in Kyrgyzstan, as well as distinguished guests from Vietnam and Laos, and other interested states who took part in the work of the Round Table: Games of the Nomadic and Sedentary Peoples of the World (ICON) and the creation of the International Nomadic Committee (ICON INC)
1. International relations and traditional trade links have been subjected to the destructive influence of antiravstvennoral individuals who lack conscience and empathy for people.
2. Antinravstvennoral individuals have led humanity to a nravstvennoral crisis, which manifested itself in the dominance of material interests over spiritual ones. A threat to the very existence of human civilization has arisen.
3. The Nravstvennoi Path of Humanity is a global project of civilization aimed at forming its nravstvennoral atmosphere.
4. The ecological, ethical and technological foundation of the nravstvennoral path of humanity is based on the following principles, rules, methods and technologies:
global ecological principle (GEP): a person should not harm himself, other people and the environment;
global ethical nravstvennoral principle (GENP): a person must observe the Global Ecological Principle (GEP) consciously;
Nravstvennoral Rule III-C: do not harm yourself (C1), your neighbors (C2), your environment (C3) either by thought, word, or deed; create for yourself, your neighbors, your environment by thought, word, and deed;
discursive-evaluative method (DEM): consists of organizing broad participation of citizens in the discussion and evaluation of socially significant decisions from the positions of GEP, GENP, III-C; serves as the basis for the technology of changing the worldview paradigm.
ecosocial technologies (EST): a set of techniques for applying the discursive-evaluative method in the formation of a new worldview paradigm;
nravstvennoral pedagogy (NP) or ecopedagogy (EP): practical pedagogical science about the methods of teaching and education, supplemented by the discursive-evaluative method.
5. The education of a person who does not harm himself, other people and the environment is carried out with the help of environmental pedagogy (ecopedagogy).
6. This pedagogy is based on the global ecological principle and the discursive-evaluative method. Their interaction integrates the social and personal-individual levels. As a result, the nravstvennoral personality of a person is formed, observing the rule III-C in his behavior (do not harm oneself (C1), neighbors (C2), the environment (C3) neither by thought, nor by word, nor by deed; create for oneself, neighbors, the environment by thought, word, and deed).
7. The main direction of interaction between society and the individual is the assimilation by the individual of the value norm (rule III-C) in the process of training and education, and the further consolidation of this rule in the legal, economic, financial and political systems of society.
8. Nravstvennost as a basic value of an individual is formed in the process of his/her life activity, and is identified in communication as a group and social value, approved by society and in demand by the state for persons holding public positions.
9. The central problem of society is resolved on the nravstvennoral path - this is the answer to the question of a person's attitude towards himself, other people and the environment. In the most general sense, this attitude is set by the nravstvennoral rule III-C (do not harm yourself (C1), neighbors (C2), the environment (C3) either by thought, word or deed; create for yourself, neighbors, the environment by thought, word and deed).
10. Nravstvennoral knowledge (rule III-C), formed in the family and educational organizations from early childhood and maintained throughout a person’s life, is the connecting thread between the human spirit, other people, the environment and creative practical activity.
To know the nravstvennoral rule III-C means to have a clear, well-founded idea not only of what is, but also of what should be in human relations: not to harm and to create. The application of the nravstvennoral rule III-C presupposes the transformation of what exists on the basis of the idea of what should be.
11. A person not only learns about the world, but also acts on the basis of the knowledge he has received. This means that knowledge in a broad sense includes not only ideas about the surrounding reality, but also plans, assessments, norms, promises, warnings, ideals, models, etc. A person has a fairly clear, well-founded idea of nravstvennorality and its opposite – antinravstvennorality. Nravstvennost is assessed in people as good through not causing harm, antinravstvennorality as evil through causing harm.
12. Politics is social relations regarding the distribution of public (not only material) goods.
13. Antinravstvennoral policy is a distribution of public goods that causes harm to society, destroys the social and biological foundations of human life, and creates inequality. Antinravstvennoral policy leads to social catastrophe.
14. Nravstvennoral policy is such a distribution of public goods that the nravstvennoral rule III-C is observed: do not harm yourself (C1), your neighbors (C2), or your environment (C3) by thought, word, or deed; create for yourself, your neighbors, and your environment by thought, word, and deed.
15. Nravstvennoral policy is supported by law and the discursive-evaluative process. Citizens participate in the discussion and evaluation of decisions on the distribution of public goods. This creates a condition of trust in state and municipal authorities. The country's leadership gains nravstvennoral superiority. Such power wins in all types of confrontations. Nravstvennoral superiority, based on the involvement of society in self-government and open distribution of public goods, provides everyone with genuine freedom, restores justice, and ensures the legitimate well-being (wealth) of citizens.
16. Nravstvennoral policy becomes the soft power of the state and society, which guarantees their security and development. The soft power of a nravstvennoral state and society in the form of free and wealthy citizens, whose benefits are protected by such a state, replaces lethal wars.
17. In the context of the inevitability of conflict situations, nravstvennoral policy is aimed at forming a humane, non-lethal confrontation between the conflicting parties.
18. Nravstvennoral policy is a source of national and international law - a source that ensures the ecology of social relations in society and the state.
19. Nravstvennoral policy is implemented through state policy and public self-government, which ensure support and responsibility in relation to the nravstvennoral or antinravstvennoral actions of social subjects.
Nravstvennoral policy can be taken as a guide to action by politicians and citizens of all countries of the international community.
20. Negative civil consent – a consolidated (aggregated) condemning opinion of many social subjects regarding the social actions (inaction) of other social subjects, can today be visualized in the form of visual images, literally painted in different colors.
The planes of negative civil consent are visualized in color (green, blue, red).
Ecological discursive regulators of society (https://www.globalnrav.ast.social;https://euroopen.ast.social). This is an ethical traffic light. It is based on a scale of harm.
Green color means that others evaluate the subject as acting without harm and who can continue further action.
The blue color signifies the difficulty in assessing the subject, the difficulty in recognizing the harm from him, the success of the social masking of the person being assessed, the threats of which are not distinguished by others.
The appearance of the color red reminds the actor that others see harm or a threat in his actions.
This is a reason to think, analyze the current situation, and provide new arguments for and against the appropriate actions.
An important constructive feature of discursive ethical regulators is the principle of self-punishment used in them.
Here the principle of retribution for harm during the life of a specific person is realized. It is realized by others through mass ethical assessment.
Mass ethical assessment is the determination of the level of nravstvennorality of a social subject by other assessors.
The object of mass ethical assessment develops responsibility for the commission of a social action. In the case of a harmful social action, a feeling of guilt arises, without which there can be no talk of full correction, restoration of social health.
The healing sense of guilt and the sense of shame associated with it leads to self-correction of the subject's behavior. He can publicly repent, apologize online to others for his harmful actions. At the same time, he has a clear understanding that no one else is guilty except him. He faces the internal question: "Why did I do this?", "I will not do it again." And this is the path to his nravstvennoral improvement.
21. In order for the practice of nravstvennoral behavior to become the basis for human humanitarian progress (the refusal to kill man by man), it is important to support rituals of discourse and mass ethical (nravstvennoral, ethical) assessment in society. For this purpose, heads of state authorities, public and private organizations form management, educational and professional teams through which they implement management and professional practices, the process of education and training of citizens.
ECOSOCIAL TECHNOLOGY OF PREVENTION
LETHATAL WARS
The ecosocial technology of preventing lethal wars consists of launching into discursive-evaluative practice the universal enemies of humanity (sociopaths, social parasites), who, in order to maintain their tyranny, antinravstvennorality and irresponsibility, to retain the captured power and wealth, incite local and global lethal wars, push people, nations and states into bloody massacres under various kinds of provocative slogans.
Any lethal war can be just if it is aimed at protecting society and the state from internal and external social parasites, sociopaths. A state that has taken a nravstvennoral position inevitably becomes an object of attacks by external and internal enemies (sociopaths, social parasites). A society that has embarked on the nravstvennoral path of its development will inevitably be subjected to vicious attacks by external and internal universal enemies, who will make every effort to nravstvennorally decompose such a society. Otherwise, they will not survive. They need an antinravstvennoral atmosphere, global bloodbaths, to keep all the countries of the world and their inhabitants under control.
The presented ecosocial technology can be used by all nations of the world, social activists and government officials who have taken a nravstvennoral position and intend to put an end to lethal wars forever. Ecosocial technology allows solving this problem. Due to group expert and mass identification, as well as ethical assessment of specific warmongers, the neutralization of the activities of the enemies of humanity - sociopaths, social parasites - that are harmful to the world community is carried out.
Ecosocial technology was developed by institutes and departments of the Academy of Ecosocial Technologies, based on the provisions of the USSR military scientific school of V.A. Chigirev and P.I. Yunatskevich.
1. Nravstvennoral principle and nravstvennost
1.1. Nravstvennoral principle – do no harm to yourself, others, or the environment. It is realized in the nravstvennoral rule “Three Cs” (III-C): do no harm to yourself, your neighbors, or the environment, either by thought, word, or deed; create for yourself, your neighbors, and the environment by thought, word, and deed.
1.2. Nravstvennost is a general expression of those properties of human nature that perform the function of regulating relations between members of society, regardless of social, national, religious and other factors. It is a special attitude of thinking and behavior that allows one not to harm oneself, others, and the environment.
1.3. Harm is a disturbance of human life that is felt and experienced by a person. Threat is a potential harm to human life.
1.4. The ability to recognize harm and threats to citizens is formed in the process of socialization and is reinforced during the study of the rule “Three C” (III-C) in each family and educational institutions:
do no harm to yourself (C1),
do not harm neighbors (C2),
do not harm the environment (C3),
neither in thought, nor in word, nor in deed;
to create for oneself, one's neighbors, and the environment with thought, word, and deed.
1.5. Nravstvennost can be used by any person to determine their own system of values. Nravstvennoral values reach any person voluntarily due to their attractiveness and universality, and are supported by the participation of all citizens in nravstvennoral education and enlightenment.
2. Ensuring nravstvennorality
2.1. Nravstvennost is ensured by education, enlightenment, propaganda, state and municipal authorities, and the management of public and private organizations.
2.2. In order to foster nravstvennorality, nravstvennoral classes are held in educational institutions and other organizations.
2.3. During lessons and classes on nravstvennorality, citizens, guided by the nravstvennoral rule, acquire the ability to give public nravstvennoral assessments of events and actions that are committed by other subjects. The ability to recognize antinravstvennoral actions in one's own behavior, as well as in the behavior of other citizens and organizations, is a mandatory educational outcome of conducting a lesson on secular ethics.
2.4. The preparation and implementation of lessons and classes onnravstvennorality is provided by state and local authorities, public and private organizations, parents and persons replacing them.
2.5. Nravstvennoral education and nravstvennoral propaganda are organized in the mass media and with the help of information and communication resources. They are aimed at a visual presentation of the advantages of nravstvennoral behavior and ensure that each citizen is provided with examples of the onset of legal liability for antinravstvennorality, unethical behavior and lack of conscience.
3. Strengthening mutual trust between citizens and state and municipal authorities, economic entities
3.1. The behavior of a person guided by a nravstvennoral rule is nravstvennost.
3.2. Only nravstvennoral behavior that ensures the emergence of trust is ethical.
3.3. Trust – social relations that arise between citizens and civil organizations in the absence of mutual harm and threats. Without trust, the existence of civil society is impossible.
3.4. Society and the state interact on the basis of complete mutual trust, which arises as a result of the implementation of nravstvennoral behavior and management.
3.5. The common goal of the citizen, society and the state is mutual development and creation.
3.6. The formation of a nravstvennoral atmosphere in society and the state is ensured by the openness of social processes, procedures of public administration and local self-government, free discussion and ethical assessment of the behavior of social subjects, and is regulated by discursive and evaluative practices, broad discussion by society and the state of all important decisions and their results.
4. Ethical assessment
4.1. Ethical assessment is an assessment by citizens of the nravstvennorality of the actions (inactions) of other citizens and organizations of citizens from the standpoint of causing or not causing harm and threats in order to block antinravstvennoral behavior.
4.2. The process of ethical evaluation is open, regulated by citizens, society and the state, and is one of the forms of mutual trust between individuals, society and the state.
4.3. The basis for an ethical assessment is the commission by a citizen or organization of an act that is assessed by other persons as harmful or threatening to them.
4.4. A negative ethical assessment is an ethical burden on a social subject.
5. Civil consent and the scale of ethical assessment
5.1. Civil consent, positive (encouraging) or negative (condemning) is the opinion of citizens, expressed in an evaluative form regarding the social actions of social subjects.
5.2. Social action is the result of the activity of a social subject: intentions, statements, decisions, actions that affect interests, are capable of causing harm, creating a threat to more than one citizen.
5.3. A social subject is an individual, groups of people and their associations, organizations, enterprises, administration, government, civil society as a whole.
5.4. A social process is a way of existence of a social subject, its life activity carried out in interaction with other social subjects.
5.5. Negative civil consent is a consolidated condemning opinion of many social subjects regarding social actions or inactions of other social subjects. It is a tool for citizens, society and the state to protect and strengthen spiritual and nravstvennoral values, ensuring the priority of the spiritual over the material.
5.6. The ethical assessment scale (binary, multi-point) is a method of digitizing and visually representing the assessment of the level of nravstvennorality of a social subject. Ethical assessment scales can be used by citizens, organizations, and state and municipal authorities to organize the ethical assessment of social subjects.
6. Conscience and social justice
6.1. Conscience is an ethical regulator of human and citizen behavior, his internal attitude, formed in the process of nravstvennoral education with the help of other citizens and organizations that constantly correct the behavior and self-esteem of a person.
6.2. Conscience arises from ethical assessment, public discussion and condemnation of the behavior of a social subject.
6.3. Social justice is established and maintained by social actors acting in accordance with their conscience.
7. Legal liability for antinravstvennorality
7.1. Punishment and other legal measures applied to social entities who have committed antinravstvennoral, unethical and unscrupulous acts are permissible only to the extent that they are defined by current legislation.
7.2. The commission by a social subject of a social action that is ethically assessed by other subjects as antinravstvennoral leads to the formation of negative (condemnatory) civil consent.
7.3. Negative (condemnatory) civil consent in relation to a social subject leads to a loss of trust in it on the part of other social subjects.
7.4. Loss of trust leads to the destruction of the reputation of the social subject.
7.5. The lack of trust and reputation naturally hinders the implementation of the social subject's life activities. In this way, self-punishment is carried out for antinravstvennorality, unethical behavior and lack of conscience.
7.6. An official in respect of whom a negative civil consent has arisen is warned by the superior management about the threat of dismissal. In this way, the official is given the opportunity for nravstvennoral correction. In the event of continuation of antinravstvennoral actions, such person is subject to immediate dismissal from the position held due to loss of trust.
8. Global security
8.1. Global security is the state of protection of social subjects from threats and harm.
8.2. Global security is ensured by maintaining the nravstvennorality of social subjects and civil harmony.
8.3. Corruption, social stratification, poverty and destitution destroy nravstvennorality and create grounds for extremism, terrorism and other antinravstvennoral acts that violate public safety.
8.4. Combating corruption – actions of social subjects to prevent antinravstvennoral actions of other social subjects through consolidation and visual representation of negative civil consent in the ethical assessment of corrupt actions and manifestations of corruption.
8.5. The elimination of social stratification, poverty and destitution is ensured by nravstvennoral economic policy and the inviolability of private and personal property of citizens.
8.6. The antinravstvennoral socio-economic policy of the authorities leads to the loss of public trust and destroys civil harmony.
8.7. Rotation of personnel, including those who discredit the government by the fact of their presence in public positions, restores trust in the government, helps to minimize antinravstvennoral processes, and prevents lethal wars.
9. Social parasitism
9.1. Social parasitism is a way of existence of a social subject guided by the idea of personal gain at any cost. A consequence of the cult of money, double standards, and the discrepancy between words and deeds. The social parasite lives at the expense of other social subjects, without participating in their creative activity or imitating such participation.
9.2. A socially parasitic structure is an organization whose entire effort is aimed at obtaining funds to support its own existence. A characteristic feature of such a structure is the imitation of its main activity in solving social problems that are relevant to citizens.
9.3. Social parasitism is the cause of lethal wars, corruption, social stratification, extremism and terrorism.
9.4. Ways to prevent social parasitism – public control and ethical assessment of social subjects.
10. Sociopathy
10.1. Sociopathy (sociopathic disorder) is a mental illness characterized by a disturbance in a person’s thinking and behavior, leading to a systematic violation of social norms.
This mental pathology is characterized by the loss of conscience, nravstvennorality, and empathy for other people. Sociopaths do not respect the rights and feelings of others, manipulate them for their own benefit, and do not feel guilt or responsibility for their actions. The disease leads to serious problems in the personal, professional, and social relationships of people, organizations, states, and nations with whom sociopaths interact. Sociopaths constantly violate laws because they feel uncomfortable with any attempt by others to limit their arbitrariness. They have good social camouflage, using the mental modesty and social cowardice of citizens for their dominance in regulating the distribution of resources and benefits.
10.2. Diagnostic criteria for the condition of sociopaths, explained by the loss of conscience, nravstvennorality and empathy for others:
a) communication sphere defect: affectivity, excitability, loss of control over the desire for consumption, entertainment and dominance;
b) the chronic nature of an antinravstvennoral style of behavior, manifested in the desire to harm other people in order to maintain one’s own tyranny, dominance, unbridled consumption, entertainment, and social parasitism;
c) an antinravstvennoral style of behavior, disguised from others, manifests itself in the form of intrigues, conspiracies to cause harm and violate the laws and nravstvennorality of society, inciting mutual hatred and pitting people against each other in social situations;
d) the above-mentioned manifestations always arise in childhood or adolescence as induced states caused by imitation of specific sociopaths in the family, educational and professional environments;
d) sociopathic disorder results in significant harm to all individuals and organizations that encounter sociopaths;
e) the disorder is accompanied by a significant deterioration in the spiritual and material condition of persons who have entered into a relationship with a sociopath, deprofessionalization, and stupefaction of specialists; it is expressed in the imitation of professional activity, loss of a sense of duty and personal responsibility to society and the state.
To make a diagnosis, at least three criteria must be determined:
G1. An indication that the characteristic and constant types of internal experiences and behavior of the individual as a whole deviate significantly from the nravstvennoral norm specified by nravstvennoral rule III-C: the individual causes harm to others (-C2) and to the environment (-C3). Such a deviation must be manifested in more than one of the following areas:
1) in the cognitive sphere, there is a negative way of thinking about the people around and the environment, hatred of other people and fear of them, compensation for this fear through manipulation, seizure of power, resources, money, with the aim of depriving others of the opportunity to resist the tyranny of sociopaths;
2) in various situations (secret conspiracies, intrigues) negative emotions of sociopaths are manifested: anger, hatred, envy, irritation, remorse of greed towards others;
3) there is no control over drives and satisfaction of basic needs for food, consumption, entertainment, dominance; there are attempts to seize power in the personal and public spheres;
4) relationships with others and the manner of resolving interpersonal situations are of the nature of exploitation, humiliation, robbery and other forms of causing social harm.
G2. Deviations of this kind appear all the more symptomatic if they are sophisticated in nature and disguised as socially important goals and popular slogans that cannot be reduced to individual situations.
G3. They have an adverse effect on the social environment.
10.3. Personality disorder is characterized by a gross discrepancy between behavior and prevailing social norms. At the same time, it is characterized by the presence of general diagnostic criteria for personality disorder on a number of points:
a) loss of conscience, heartless indifference to the feelings of others;
b) a gross and persistent attitude of irresponsibility and disregard for social rules and responsibilities;
c) inability to maintain relationships in the absence of difficulties in their establishment, failure to comply with any agreements with people, organizations, society and the state;
d) extremely low ability to withstand frustration (a mental state caused by failure to satisfy needs), as well as a low threshold for the discharge of aggression, including violence;
d) inability to experience guilt and to benefit from life experience, including such forms of it as punishment;
e) a tendency to blame others for everything and everywhere and to put forward plausible explanations for one’s destructive behavior, leading to conflict with society, the state, and the laws (“everyone betrayed me,” “deceived me,” “set me up,” and other similar justifications);
g) the presence of constant irritability, bitterness, conflict;
c) disruption of behavioral norms in childhood and adolescence, subsequent difficulties in learning and superficiality of knowledge, lack of professional skills, compensated by verbosity with the use of unusual words and terms reflecting amateurism;
i) the sociopath's disregard for ethical norms and rules, usually explained by the fact that society and the state have allegedly caused him harm and now he is thus free to choose any means and methods to achieve his goals. In this case, the choice of means and methods is of a criminal, antinravstvennoral nature.
11. Technology of prevention of sociopathy
11.1. To prevent sociopathy, the technology of forming teams at all levels of state administration and public self-government is used. In the team, sociopathic manifestations are minimized.
11.2. A collective is a social group in which a nravstvennoral atmosphere has been formed, characterized by the following features:
internal unity of ideas, goals, objectives;
joint mode of activity;
mutual assistance and support for each other according to the principle of “one for all and all for one”;
self-government, where each member of the team plays the role of an executor when solving one problem, and a leader when solving another problem;
the opportunity for each member of the team to gain authority in the form of general recognition of social and professional suitability for the position or role held;
friendship, calmness and confidence in the future of each member of the collective;
constructive behavior of collective members, ensuring their mental and physical health;
a sense of pride in belonging to a friendship, calmness and confidence in the future of each member of the collective;
joint discussion and adoption of management decisions.
11.3. Collective (educational, labor, service, professional, managerial, business and others) are formed by the heads of state authorities and public self-government in all spheres of life of society and the state.
11.4. Regulation of collective relations is carried out in accordance with the principles of voluntariness, equality of rights and obligations, resolution of intra-collective issues through general discussion and assessment, joint decision-making, by mutual consent. The priority of nravstvennoral education and self-education of members of the collective, concern for their well-being and professional development, ensuring priority protection of the rights and interests of young and experienced members of the collective, veterans of labor and service are observed.
11.5. The collective has the right to discuss, evaluate and improve decisions aimed at fulfilling the tasks assigned to it. The rights of citizens in the team may be limited based on the decision of the head of the organization that formed the collective, only to the extent that this is necessary for the purpose of protecting the nravstvennorality, health, rights and legitimate interests of other teams and other citizens.
11.6. Prevention and suppression of the spread of destructive ideology is carried out in groups.
Signs of a destructive ideology:
selfish motives and aspirations;
priority of the material over the spiritual;
hedonism, parasitism andirresponsibility.
11.7. In educational, professional and management teams, measures are taken to develop in students, employees and managers the necessary socially important qualities for successful socialization and professional activity.
Socially important personal qualities, for the formation of which the heads of organizations with their teams and self-governing bodies of teams bear equal responsibility:
nravstvennoral thinking is a special attitude of thinking and behavior that allows one not to harm oneself, others, or the environment; it is formed with the help of other citizens and organizations that constantly correct a person’s behavior and self-esteem;
a sense of duty and personal responsibility for the task assigned;
family spirit – a sense of belonging to a strong family (a stable union between a man and a woman), pride in one’s family and ancestors, which is manifested in the ability not to harm one’s family members and to create for them, to preserve historical memory and the continuity of generations;
the priority of the spiritual over the material, expressed in the predominance of nravstvennoral ideas in regulating human behavior over material stimulation of this behavior;
conscience is a person’s ability to critically evaluate their actions, thoughts, desires, to recognize and experience their inconsistency with proper behavior;
justice is a human feeling that arises in response to the nravstvennoral behavior of other people, in which actions, thoughts and words are united and correspond to people’s ideas about proper and nravstvennoral behavior;
creative work is a human activity during which material and non-material goods are created for other people. It provides positive feedback when consuming the goods created;
honor – a person’s possession of a number of nravstvennoral and psychological qualities that are assessed by other people as qualities worthy of respect, forming the reputation of such a person; dishonor – the loss of such qualities, the destruction of a person’s reputation as a result of his antinravstvennoral actions;
healthy lifestyle, implementation of three provisions of the nravstvennoral rule of three C's:
do not harm yourself with thought, word, deed, and create for yourself with thought, word, deed;
do not harm other people with thought, word, deed, and create for other people with thought, word, deed;
do not harm the environment with thought, word, deed and create for the environment with thought, word, deed.
11.8. Persons holding leadership positions in the public authority system must have the following knowledge and skills to manage a collective:
personal example of nravstvennoral behavior and responsible attitude to the assigned task, priority of the spiritual over the material in the behavior of the leader;
the leader personally observes the nravstvennoral rule of the three Cs: do not harm yourself (C1), your neighbors (C2), or your environment (C3) by thought, word, or deed; create for yourself, your neighbors, and your environment by thought, word, and deed;
in managing subordinates, uses the discursive-evaluative method: a method of regulating social relations based on group expert and mass assessment when discussing socially significant decisions;
the team selects supporters of the idea of a nravstvennoral path in order to be united and invincible;
all decisions are submitted for general discussion and evaluation;
all members of the collective participate in the discussion, evaluation, joint adoption, implementation and control of the implementation of the decision taken;
the team regularly sums up the results of the implementation of decisions made;
a general assessment is given to each member of the team and management who took part in the implementation of the previously adopted decision;
new tasks are set, supported by all members of the collective;
11.9. The training and education of personnel, as well as their professional use, are carried out within the team and through the collective.
11.10. Technology of formation and provision of team activities:
formulation, discussion and general assessment by team members of ideas, goals and objectives of joint activities (educational, professional, managerial);
acceptance by all of the ideas, goals and objectives of joint activities;
training in joint (collective) action to achieve intended goals and solve set tasks;
the practice of mutual assistance and support for each other based on the principle of “one for all and all for one”;
self-management: each member of the team is assigned several roles of leader and performer of various tasks;
regular general (collective) assessment of each member for his social and professional compliance with the social or professional position he occupies;
holding events aimed at establishing friendly relations between collective members;
care for each member of the collective, so that there is confidence in the nravstvennoral present and future;
constructive behavior of collective members, ensuring their mental and physical health;
rewarding and encouraging collective members to create a sense of pride in belonging to a given collective;
joint discussion, evaluation, adoption and implementation of educational, professional, and management decisions.
12. Ethics and rotation of management personnel
12.1. Management personnel are required to strictly adhere to nravstvennoral standards.
12.2. Citizens can continuously evaluate the social actions of management personnel. This process can be supplemented by public discourse of social actors and visual representation of the results of discursive practices.
12.3. Failure to comply with nravstvennoral standards, revealed during the ethical assessment of the actions of management personnel by citizens, should lead to the rotation of these managers.
12.4. Rotation of management personnel convicted of antinravstvennoral behavior unites society with state and municipal authorities, counteracts corruption, crime, extremism and terrorism, and prevents the emergence of lethal wars.
13. Ethical assessment as a procedure for preventing lethal wars
13.1. Ethical assessment is a state and civil procedure carried out by state authorities and citizens who have experienced harm from the activities of other citizens and organizations. Public ethical assessment is a generally accessible way of regulating social relations, implements the right of citizens to freedom of speech and nravstvennoral choice, and ensures the prevention of lethal wars.
13.2. A social subject may bring information about antinravstvennoral acts of other social subjects into the public sphere for open discussion. The social subject is responsible for the reliability of this information in accordance with current legislation.
13.3. Information about antinravstvennoral behavior of social subjects brought into the public sphere is subject to ethical assessment. All interested social subjects may participate in the process of ethical assessment.
13.4. For the ethical assessment of information made public, the entities that carried out the ethical assessment and/or organized it cannot be held liable in accordance with international law.
13.5. During the ethical assessment, a citizen expresses in any form, on written or electronic media, his assessment of the harm he has received from the individual or legal entity being assessed, or his opinion regarding the harm from a particular social action of any social subject.
13.6. Individuals and legal entities regulate their activities taking into account the ethical assessments of citizens. Taking into account a positive or negative ethical assessment is carried out independently in the form of taking appropriate measures to restore and maintain public trust and reputation.
14. Discursive practice as a state military and civil procedure for preventing lethal wars
14.1. Discursive practice as a state military and civil procedure for the prevention of lethal wars is the free participation of interested social subjects in the ethical assessment and discussion of socially significant actions of other social subjects.
14.2. Discursive practice may be carried out by government bodies and citizens in the form of forums, state, scientific, expert and public councils, open communication, and may also be reflected in the media and other information and communication resources.
14.3. The personal ethical assessment of any social subject can be changed only by him personally an unlimited number of times in the course of discursive practice.
14.4. Discourses are continuous in nature and ensure the education of nravstvennorality of social subjects, social justice and civil peace, form private norms regulating the behavior of social subjects, carry out the prevention of lethal wars and deprofessionalization (stupefaction, loss of intellectual superiority over the enemy) of military administrative, scientific and pedagogical personnel, specialists of the military-industrial complex.
14.5. Discursive practices are dynamic, subjective and cannot be the basis for holding social subjects participating in them liable in