Hello, lovers of the mysteries of the universe! Imagine: you throw a thick encyclopedia into the fire. The ashes are scattered by the wind. It would seem that the information is lost forever? But it's not! Quantum physics says: in principle, every letter of a burned book can be reconstructed from these ashes. But what if your "bonfire" is a black hole? This is where the main puzzle of modern science begins – the Paradox of the disappearance of information. Get ready for the battle of the Titans: Einstein vs the Quanta!
Photo by 愚木混株 Yumu on Unsplash
Act 1: The Ominous Prophecy of Hawking (1974)
It all started with a brilliant but frightening discovery by a young Stephen Hawking. In 1974, reflecting on the quantum effects at the event horizon of a black hole, he made a sensational conclusion: black holes "evaporate"! This phenomenon is called Hawking Radiation.
How it works (very simplified): Pairs of "virtual particles" are constantly being born from the vacuum at the very horizon of events. One particle falls into a hole, the other flies off into space. An escaped particle carries away energy. This means that the hole loses mass over time (huge!) disappears completely, "evaporating".
Catastrophe: Hawking showed that this radiation is absolutely chaotic ("thermal"). There is no information about what fell into the hole! Dust, stars, entire galaxies – everything turns into the same "noise" of photons. When the hole evaporates, there will be no trace of what created it. The information is destroyed forever.
Photo by Jason Fitt on Unsplash
Why is this a PARADOX? Two Irreconcilable Laws:
Quantum Mechanics (reigned since the 1920s): Its fundamental principle is unitarity. Information in the universe is never lost! It can get confused, hide, but theoretically it is always recoverable. It's like shuffling cards in a deck– the order is out of order, but the cards are all there. Hawking threw the deck into the fire.
Einstein's General Theory of Relativity (GR) (1915): It predicts black holes with an event horizon – the boundary of "no return". Everything inside is forever cut off from the outside universe. GRT by itself does not prohibit the loss of information.
Hawking's conclusion (1974-1980s): When a black hole evaporates, information is irretrievably lost. This violates quantum mechanics. This means that quantum mechanics is incomplete and needs to be revised!
Act 2: The Rise of the Quantum Warriors. "No!" said Susskind (1993)
Theoretical physicists loyal to quantum mechanics clutched their heads in horror. The loss of information is the cornerstone of all science! The Great Black Hole War Has Begun.
Hawking's Main Opponent: Leonard Susskind. In 1993, he and Dutch physicist Gerard 't Hooft (1999 Nobel Laureate) came up with a radical idea: Information is NOT lost! It is somehow encoded at the very event horizon of a black hole, or even related to Hawking radiation.
The principle of Holography ('t Hooft, Susskind, ser. 1990's): That was the key! They suggested that all the information contained in a volume of space (like the interior of a black hole) can be fully described at its boundary (the event horizon), like a hologram. Horizon works like a giant "flash drive" that stores data about absorbed objects.
How does the information "come out"? This is a very difficult question. Imagine that the information of a falling object is "imprinted" on the horizon in the form of microscopic distortions (Planck-sized "pixels"). Then, when Hawking radiation leaves the hole, it carries away this encoded data. It is almost impossible to decipher them (this is pure quantum noise), but theoretically it is possible. Information is saved!
Act 3: Does Hawking Capitulate? (2004) And The New Mine: Wall of Fire (2012)
Plot Twist: 2004. Stephen Hawking made a sensational statement at a conference in Dublin. He abandoned his previous position and admitted that information probably wasn't lost! He agreed with the holographic principle, suggesting that the event horizon may not be as "smooth" as predicted by general relativity, but fluctuating, which allows information to leak out. It was a triumph for Susskind and 't Hooft. The war seemed to be over...
...But Physics Does Not Forgive Easy Victories: 2012. Physicists Ahmed Almheiri, Donald Marolf, Joe Polchinsky and James Sully– known as "AMPS" – have planted a new, powerful "bomb". They analyzed the consequences of preserving information and the holographic principle. Their conclusion: The "Fire Wall"!
What is the paradox? In order for information to be encoded on the horizon and carried away by radiation, the quantum entanglement between Hawking radiation (already released) and particles inside the hole must be broken. But according to quantum mechanics, breaking entanglement is a high–energy process!
The terrible conclusion is that there must be a huge energy density on the event horizon itself – a wall of high-energy particles, literally a "wall of fire" that will burn anyone who tries to cross the horizon. But Einstein's general relativity predicts that crossing the horizon is an imperceptible event for a falling observer (the principle of "no dramatic places")! A new paradox: General relativity vs Quantum Mechanics is in conflict again! Either the horizon is a place of incredible heat, or information is lost. Is there no third option?
Getty Images For Unsplash+
Our Time: A Maze of Hypotheses and a Search for a Way Out (2010s - 2020s)
The paradox of the "Wall of Fire" has stirred up the community. A forest of new ideas has appeared (often mind-bogglingly complex):
ER = EPR (2013): Juan Maldacena and Leonard Susskind proposed an elegant but speculative idea. What if particles that are quantum entangled across the horizon are connected by wormholes (Einstein-Rosen bridges, ER) in space-time? This could explain the transmission of information without breaking the entanglement and without a wall of fire. So far, it's a hypothesis.
Quantum Teleportation? Can information be "teleported" from the inside out through quantum entanglement?
"Fluffy" Black Holes: Maybe the horizon is not a sharp boundary, but a blurred "fluffy" area where quantum effects begin?
Experimental Tips? There are almost none right now. However, the study of gravitational waves from black hole mergers (LIGO/Virgo observatories, first detected in 2015) and attempts to simulate black holes in laboratories (for example, using analog event horizons) may provide indirect data.
Bottom Line: Quantum Gravity Remains The Battlefield.
The paradox of information disappearing is not just an academic dispute. This is a fundamental test of the strength of our deepest theories of nature: quantum mechanics and general relativity. To solve it, we probably need a Unified Theory of Quantum Gravity (the Theory of Everything) that unites these pillars of physics.
The stakes are prohibitive: If information is lost, the whole quantum mechanics collapses. If the horizon is a wall of fire, it collapses from Einstein in its usual form.
Consensus (for 2024): Most physicists believe that information is preserved (the holographic principle is too beautiful and useful to be abandoned). But how exactly this happens without violating other laws remains the greatest mystery.
This is a battle of ideas: Hawking vs Susskind/'t Hooft, GRT vs Quanta, Smooth Horizon vs Wall of Fire. The battle where the future of physics is born.