Statement: a good teacher should always be strict and exacting.
Some people think a good teacher should be strict, always criticizing his students and giving boring lessons. That way, in their opinion, students will study better. But it is really supposed to be like that?
As I think, a teacher doesn't have to be obligatory strict to be a good teacher. A good teacher is ready to listen to his students and to help them, explain a topic again and give an example. He is interested in involving students in the learning process. I don't agree that shouting and strictness can make an effect there.
On the other hand, what can a teacher do if his students don't want to study? The last way after trying to make them interested and thinking of topics they could discuss, is, of course, making them learning. I don't support this method, in my opinion, a good, sensitive teacher is able to prepare, but I don't know what can he do if the kids aren't involved in his subject at all. So the teacher might show his strictness in this situation. But only in a critic case.
So, a good teacher isn't always strict, and a strict teacher isn't always good! There should be a balance into feeling the students and the education process.
But still: if the teacher is good or bad, only the students can charge. Without people's critics it is difficult to make an opinion about any work.
231 word