Уважаемые коллеги, доброго времени суток! Представляем вам научное издание из Саудовской Аравии Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal. Журнал имеет второй квартиль, издаётся в King Saud University, находится в открытом доступе, его SJR за 2022 г. равен 0,629, импакт-фактор 4,1, электронный ISSN - 1319-0164, предметные области - Фармацевтические науки, Фармакология. Вот так выглядит обложка:
Редактором является Авс Алшамсан, контактные данные - aalshamsan@ksu.edu.sa, sqasoumi@ksu.edu.sa.
Это официальный журнал Саудовского фармацевтического общества (SPS), публикующий высококачественные клинически ориентированные материалы, охватывающие различные дисциплины фармацевтических наук и смежные дисциплины. Саудовское фармацевтическое общество в сотрудничестве с Фармацевтическим колледжем Университета короля Сауда и публикует восемь выпусков журнала SPJ в год.
Адрес издания - https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/saudi-pharmaceutical-journal
Пример статьи, название - Unveiling medication errors in liver transplant patients towards enhancing the imperative patient safety. Заголовок (Abstract)
Background
Medication errors (MEs) are a significant healthcare problem that can harm patients and increase healthcare expenses. Being immunocompromised, liver-transplant patients are at high risk for complications if MEs inflict harmful or damaging effects. The present study reviewed and analyzed all MEs reported in Liver Transplant Patients.
Methods
All MEs in the Liver Transplant Patients admitted between January 2016 to August 2022 were retrieved through the computerized physician order entry system, which two expert pharmacists classified according to the type and severity risk index.
Results
A total of 314 records containing 407 MEs were committed by at least 71 physicians. Most of these errors involved drugs unrelated to managing liver-transplant-related issues. Antibiotic prescriptions had the highest mistake rate (17.0%), whereas immunosuppressants, routinely used in liver transplant patients, rank second with fewer than 14% of the identified MEs. The most often reported MEs (43.2%) are type-C errors, which, despite reaching patients, did not cause patient harm. Subgroup analysis revealed several factors associated with a statistically significant great incidence of MEs among physicians treating liver transplant patients.
Conclusion
Although a substantial number of MEs occurred with liver transplant patients, the majority are not related to liver-transplant medications, which mainly belonged to type-C errors. This could be attributed to polypharmacy of transplant patients or the heavy workload on health care practitioners. Improving patient safety requires adopting regulations and strategies to promptly identify MEs and address potential errors.
Keywords: Medication errors; Liver transplant; Near-miss; Harm category; Patient safety