Уважаемые коллеги, доброго времени суток! Представляем вам канадское научное издание Mathematical Modelling of Engineering Problems. Журнал имеет третий квартиль, издается в International Information and Engineering Technology Association, его SJR за 2020 г. равен 0,26, печатный ISSN - 2369-0739, электронный - 2369-0747, предметные области - Инжиниринг, Моделирование и имитация, Прикладная математика. Вот так выглядит обложка:
Редактором является Джулио Лоренцини, контактные данные - giulio.lorenzini@unipr.it, editor.mmep@iieta.org.
К публикации принимаются оригинальные статьи ученых, инженеров и техников со всего мира, которые сосредоточены на разработке и применении математических моделей для инженерных задач в области механики, энергетики, гражданского строительства, электротехники, материалов, компьютеров и промышленности.
Адрес издания - https://www.iieta.org/Journals/MMEP
Пример статьи, название - Naturally Ventilated Double Skin Façades: Comparisons Between Different CFD Models. Заголовок (Abstract) - Double Skin Façades (DSFs) have become widespread solutions commonly employed in new and existing buildings in the last decades. Since its introduction, the multi-layered façade has improved profoundly, assuming more articulate and complex shapes for better energy performances and combining advanced technologies as innovative materials or systems. However, the effectiveness and the thermal behaviour of DSFs should be carefully evaluated since the design phase by selecting proper methodologies, thus avoiding inaccurate results. In fact, the correct estimation of the airflows inside DSF channels is heavily influenced by the simulation settings. Furthermore, the lack of measurements or empirical validations in the field is the primary source of concern for researchers. Considering the available numerical methods for investigating DSFs, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations have proven to be the most appropriate option. The present work compares multiple Double Skin Façade configurations by performing CFD analyses and adopting different turbulence models in bi- and three-dimensional domains. The results underline the capability of 2D models in predicting the fluxes inside the DSF channel and in the domain. Furthermore, comparisons among the velocity profiles estimated by adopting different turbulence formulations highlight only slight variations, especially in proximity to the perturbated areas of the cavity. Keywords: CFD modelling, Double Skin Façade, naturally ventilated façade, turbulence model