Epigraph:
The little son came to his father and asked the little one:
- That means good and what means bad?
Preface:
This work is not presented in the form of a lecture, but rather a summary of the lecture, a sketch, an outline. This work contains theses that should be used as hyperlinks. The information is provided in a compressed form, which requires additional time to decrypt, so I recommend reading slowly. And even better, re-read it several times, but not in a row, but after a certain period of time. Perhaps, over time, with changes in external conditions, the point of view on this work will also change.
Since the meaning of the statements was already clear to me, I didn't spend much time explaining. Guided by the Pareto law, I did 1/5 of the work, and I leave the remaining 4/5 to be done by you. If my explanations do not help you understand the meaning of the statements, I hope you will take a little time to figure it out on your own. If detailed explanations are given for each statement, then the work will turn out to be very voluminous, and perhaps, in the process of reading such a work, consciousness will relax, and the meaning will slip away.
The work is not scientific, it contains only conclusions, without a description of research, and those who are interested can conduct their research to confirm or refute the hypotheses put forward. I could write a separate article for each thesis, but then I would get a collection of articles, and I set myself the task of creating a compact finished work. In the end, it still turned out to be a collection of articles, because it is impossible to finish such a work, it will always change and be supplemented. The purpose of the work is to sow doubt, receive criticism and provoke discussion.
Subject: Why is it called a world's building?
"Give me a fulcrum and I will move the earth" - these words are attributed to Archimedes, one of the greatest scientists in the world. The world's building is the fulcrum with which you can turn the world around.
Let's analyze the phrase the world's building. What is the world? The world is everything that surrounds us. What are the synonyms of this word? What word can it be replaced with? For example, the universe. But the world is more than the universe, the universe is a part of space, there may be a few universes, and the world is one, it includes all universes. The world is everything. Nature can also be synonymous with the word world. Perhaps someone thinks that nature is just alive, but I believe that nature is both alive and lifeless, it is also everything that can be around us.
If the world is all around, then where is the building called the world's building, because one building cannot include the whole world? However, it can, because the world is everything that is around us, and the world's building is not around us, but inside us. The world's building is in our head, in our thoughts, in our consciousness. The world's building is a model of the outside world.
What is a model? A model is a form of representation of an object (original) that contains essential properties of the object being modelled. The model is used to study the properties of an object. Such an object can be not only an object but also a process or a state. We create a world's building within ourselves to study the world around us.
Each of us sees the world in our own way, through our own worldview. Each of us has our own worldview, and everyone's inner world is different, although the outer world should probably be the same. But, I do not presume to state unequivocally, perhaps this is not so, because I, like everyone else, see the world only through the prism of my worldview.
We use memory to build the world's building. Memory can be defined as the ability to store and retrieve information. Vision only provides information, and memory is needed to be able to use this information in the future. And here it is very important how our memory processes the information received. If everything is neatly arranged on the shelves, then it is easier to find and get it, and if you throw everything at random, then you won't find anything later. Look at the room you live in, at your workplace, this is what your mind looks like. If there is a mess, then there is a mess in the mind. If everything is neatly laid out, then there is order in the mind.
Here I would like to point out such a very important function of memory as forgetting. That's right, the forgetting function is very important. If we could remember everything that happened in our life, then our brains would explode, we would go crazy. If from birth we were able to accurately distribute the information received on the shelves of our mind, then perhaps we would remember everything. But when after birth we open our eyes for the first time in life, we still do not know how to neatly layout the information, which means, to systematize the information received. You could even say that we don't know how to memorize. Who can remember anything from their life before the age of five? If only separate fragments. But when we memorize the alphabet, learn the multiplication table, then our mind will be already trained. But we still do not know how to systematize and neatly layout information on the shelves of the mind on our own. We still need a teaching assistant who will "chew and put in the mouths," and we will only have to swallow the information received.
If there is little information, then it can be stored in a small pantry, and if there is a lot, then the whole building will be needed. What are the synonyms for the building? For example, a construction. I think everyone remembers the tale of the three piglets. Each had its construction, and only the third had a building. How does a building differ from other constructions? The word building sounds like it is something solid, strong, and stable. This is exactly what our world's building should be, if it is strong, stable, then no external influences can destroy it, and if it is easily shaken, then it will break from light breathing.
If our world's building is weak, we doubt, then we say “it seems to me” because we are not sure, maybe it just seemed to us, but in fact, everything is not as we imagine. When we say "I think so", we're not quite sure either. And when we don't use these expressions in our statements, it means that we are sure that our world's building is strong. But we should always check our world's building not only for strength but also for an objective reflection of reality, that is, for correctness. If the world's building is strong, but not built correctly, then the world is not what we imagine, then our actions can lead to unexpected results. It may seem to us that we are doing something right, but it is not, because the model was built incorrectly. To prevent this from happening, we need to question everything, including our world's building. It is necessary to develop critical thinking. If we rebuild our world's building several times during our life, this is good, and it means that our model will ultimately be more similar to the original.
Subject: Everything is divided into two
It will be very useful for us to be capable of splitting everything into two parts to building a model. This skill is used in classification, when splitting study area into parts, according to an attribute, that is, according to the value of a property. If the study area is large, then to make it easier to study it, you need to divide the study area into parts, and then study each part separately. Since the world is big, you will have to split it into many parts to study. To divide into many parts, you first need to divide everything into two parts, and then the resulting parts can be divided into two again, and so on until you get parts acceptable for study. If the parts are still too large, split them into two.
You can easily apply this separation when using the prefix "NOT". For example, numbers that are divisible by five, and numbers that are not divisible by five, red and not red, solid and not solid, bad and not bad, and so on. And it is not at all necessary that these parts be equal.
Someone might argue that not everything is splitting into 2 parts; something is divisible into 3, 10, or 12 parts. I don't mind, but first, everything is splitting into 2 parts. To split into 3 parts, you can first split into 2 parts, and then split one of the received parts into 2 again, and then you get 3 parts. Yes, these parts will turn out to be unequal in size, but it is not important for classification. When performing the classification, it is not known what size the parts will be, because the size of the resulting parts can be determined only after separation, first we split, and then, if interested, we measure. If we need to split something into parts of equal size, this process has nothing to do with classification, first, we measure and then split into the required number of parts.
Measurement allows us to determine the quantitative characteristics of the object under study, and classification determines the qualitative characteristics of the object. Together, these characteristics determine all the properties of the object; give a complete description of the object being studied. Based on the obtained description, it is possible to build an object model so that the model reproduces the basic properties of the object. Basic properties allow us to determine that we have this particular object, and not any other, these properties allow us to separate this object from others.
Subject: Communication is important
Air, water, and food are essential for human life. A person can live without air for a very short time, without water a little more, without food even more, but nothing can be completely excluded because this will inevitably lead to death. Some of you may not yet know that communication is necessary for a person's life, and it also can be excluded only for a limited time.
To punish a criminal who is already serving a sentence - sitting in prison, he may be placed in a room for a while in which he will be alone, and this is punishment, because in this way he is denied communication, and he can't stay there permanently without a threat to his life.
You may have seen some people talking to pets or even inanimate objects. I do not presume that animals have a soul, but I know that they, like objects, cannot answer. Then why talk to them, and not just talk, but imagine that they are responding? Because in this way people satisfy their need for communication.
Each of us has a different level of need for communication: some have more, some have less. Women have a higher level of need for communication than men. Those who are engaged in creative activities have a higher level of need for communication than those who are associated with the exact sciences. The artists constantly need a standing ovation, the more fans, the better they feel. Each of us chooses the path corresponding to our character, and if we are mistaken in the choice, then later we feel out of place, out of the element.
To satisfy the need for communication, it is important who we communicate with. We divide all people according to the criteria of the value of communication. Try to imagine your familiar divided into several groups. The first group: these are those you hug or kiss when you meet, and this is dictated not by a ritual, but by your desire, the same group includes those you immediately begin to tell the latest events from your life, share your emotions. The second group: these are those who tightly shake hands, perhaps even take an elbow, and at the same time not only say hello, but immediately exchange several phrases, such as how are you, how was the day, or how did you spend the weekend. The third group: you silently shake hands or throw a dry "hello". The fourth group: who you don't even greet. This is roughly how we determine the value of communicating with different people. As you may have guessed, communication with people from the first group is the most valuable for us, and the value of the following groups decreases. Of course, the number of groups can be more or less, the boundaries of the groups are conditional and can be blurred, the groups can consist of one person. Each of us himself determines the composition of the groups and gives an individual assessment to each group, and in most cases, it seems to us, this is done unconsciously - intuitively.
To satisfy our need for communication, we need to communicate with someone, at least one, from the first group, and if it does not work out, then we try to make up for the lack of communication at the expense of more from other groups. We will not be able to make up for the lack of communication with close people, those who are most valuable to us, by communicating with unfamiliar people whose value is not great for us. But, such communication, such a diet, allows us to hold out until the moment when we can share emotions with a close person.
Sex is the highest form of communication. Sex with a stranger to satisfy animal needs cannot be compared with sex in which we share emotions with a person who is dear to us. No matter how pathetic it may sound, but it's true.
A thousand likes on social networks will not help us satisfy the need for communication, and it does not matter if we liked it or we were given it because this action is one-sided and does not imply that we will be answered, and to satisfy the need for communication, a dialogue is necessary. Communication using electronic devices cannot replace communication with a living person without intermediaries, because even if we are sure that we are in dialogue with a living person, we see that our words are addressed to an inanimate object, and we often trust our eyes more than common sense.
Subject: Vanity
“Vanity is my favourite sin”, the tempter said in one of the movies. Vanity is considered one of the seven deadly sins. Hopefully, there is no need to explain that sin is synonymous with bad. Why are there only seven deadly sins? When searching for a description of the deadly sins, it turned out that there are at least two well–known opinions: there are seven deadly sins and eight deadly sins. Although both lists almost completely coincide, the presence of at least two opinions is encouraging, which means that everything is not so simple. But, most importantly, it turned out that this is not a list of sins, but a list of passions. The word passion describes a strong desire, and it seems that it is not synonymous with the word bad, but in religion, it is equated with sin. Although the list of deadly passions is limited, nevertheless, I got the impression that any strong desire is blamed. This opinion arose because I could not find a single description of passions that would be considered a virtue.
Vanity is what I call the desire for approval. In this definition, there is no phrase "strong desire", this is because there is no quantitative characteristic to determine the level of desire, therefore, there is no objective criterion by which a strong desire can be separated from a weak one. As a result, any desire for approval can be called vanity.
We can only subjectively separate a strong desire from a weak one. There are two types of opinion: subjective and objective. A synonym for subjective opinion is the subjective point of view. The subject is the one who is observing and the object is the one who is being observed. The subjective opinion depends on the point of view from which the object is observed. There can be many subjective opinions, depending on the point of view, they may coincide, or not coincide, but partially overlap, or do not intersect at all, or can be opposite. There is only one objective opinion; it can be called the truth. A separate subjective opinion may or may not be similar to an objective one. The subject does not know how much the subjective opinion is similar to the objective one. To get an opinion similar to an objective one, it is necessary to consider the object from different points of view.
My subjective assessment of a strong desire is as follows - this is a desire that is dominant, more than all other desires, so much that it is the main one in making decisions. You might be surprised to find out how many of our actions are motivated by the desire for approval. When it seems to you that the desire to get approval arises after the performed action, then you are mistaken, because this desire was the reason for your action and not a consequence. Why vanity, that is, the desire to gain approval, drives us, I explain as follows.
The founders of psychoanalysis divided our consciousness conventionally into three parts, which I call "animal", "rational" and "conscience". The "animal" is responsible for satisfying the animal's needs of the body, "rational" is what is also called "common sense", and "conscience" tries to divide the world into good and bad. Since good and bad concepts are subjective, and the world cannot be objectively divided into good and bad, the conscience is constantly plagued by doubts, and to calm down, it constantly needs confirmation that it is on the right way, so it has to constantly feed the conscience with approvals. If our world's building is strong, then there is no doubt, but the owners of an inquiring mind constantly doubt. In order not to think, in order not to waste time on doubts, we can use the principles, the more principles, the fewer doubts. But if the principles are not enough to protect the conscience from doubts, then we resort to using faith. Faith provides an opportunity to abandon the search for an objective opinion; it provides its own opinion, which must be accepted as truth, that is, as objective. Faith is practically not subject to doubt, unshakable, the world's building, built with the help of faith, is so strong and not afraid of doubts. Behind walls built of faith, the conscience can sleep peacefully.
The thirst for justice is the desire of conscience to surpass common sense, to pass off our subjective opinion as objective; this desire is so strong that it can even be called a passion. Our conscience, armed with principles, zealously rushes to common sense and sweeps it away as soon as the illusion of a choice between good and bad arises, but when such a choice is given in reality, then common sense can move the conscience, because reality is the area of responsibility of common sense, and conscience manages ideal categories that do not exist in reality. Each of us decides for himself what to be guided by in making a decision, to amuse the conscience or to try to make an objective assessment, in this case, I recommend using the criterion of reality, everything that depends on our needs to be assessed weighed, and everything that does not depend on us can be pampered by the conscience. But here another problem arises, you need to be able to distinguish reality from illusion, and this is not so easy to do, so it is better not to pamper your conscience at all, but more often to turn on the brain.
While building the world's building, each of us must constantly make decisions: succumb to vanity, bathe our conscience with approvals, fence ourselves off with principles, hide behind faith, or continue the search for truth and send our subjective opinion into a sea of doubts.
Subject: Empathy
Just as the fear of death helps us fight for life, the thirst for communication develops the desire to be part of a team. If there are colleagues with common interests, then there will always be something to talk about with them, and the prospect of being alone without communication is frightening. As a rule, we do not choose our team: classmates, friends from the same house, street, district, city, fellow countrymen, compatriots, relatives. Even though we do not choose our team, we are still ready to defend its interests, to a greater or lesser extent; we expect the same from other team members. The more we are willing to donate, the more we expect in return, and we expect that the team's help will be greater than our sacrifice. But if it turns out that this is not so, and we do not profit from our sacrifice, then, of course, we are upset, but we do not change the team, because it takes effort to change the team, we need to make a choice that we never made, and hoped that we would never have to make that choice. Or maybe we are not changing the team, because we hope in the future to get a profit from the team that will cover our losses.
The expectation that the profit from the team will be greater than the investment is quite justified. If teammates interact effectively, then the profit from an effective team will be greater than the sum of investments of each participant, this is called the effect of connections - synergy. Effective interaction provides additional profit. But this has nothing to do with the phenomenon of empathy.
When we become part of a team or consider ourselves part of a team, the success of the team is our success, a threat to the team, it is a threat to us, and we think that all team members share these emotions. The moments when we share our emotions with someone is a balm for the soul, we are ready to indulge in this sweet feeling over and over again, such a person becomes close to us, and the value of communication with him increases significantly. Unfortunately, in reality, another person, if he can share emotions with us, but not all and not always, but this does not prevent us from indulging in the illusion of empathy for any emotion with this person.
The meaning of any work of art can be conveyed in one sentence. For example, they met and fell in love, or, on the contrary, fell in love and did not meet, or ours won, or the good won, and the evil was punished. Then why do so many extra words describe what is already clear? In each work, the author describes how the heroes go from beginning to end, what emotions they experience, how they reason, what decisions they make. In such a veiled form, the author presents his opinion on the topic of what is good and what is bad. Thus, the author is trying to convince us to agree with his opinion, and it takes a lot of words to persuade. So that we do not get distracted during the learning process, we are entertained.
It's easier to convince us if we associate ourselves with the main characters, men like stories in which the main character is a man, women like stories in which the main character is a woman, children like stories in which the main characters are children. Then, along the way of the story, we begin to associate ourselves with the characters, and imagine ourselves in their place, we begin to argue “what I would do”, or “I would not do that”, we experience all the events that happen to the characters on ourselves. As a result, if the author has successfully stated everything when the characters experience some kind of emotion, we also experience these emotions. Even though the characters are fictional, they become the closest people to us, because we experience the same emotions at the same time.
Subject: Why Religion
Religion is a means of information dissemination. Now religion is the Internet, before that - television, even earlier – newspapers and books, and in those days when only a select few could read, information could be transmitted only by retelling. For information not to be distorted during transmission, there should be one source of information; those who retell information should receive it from one source. For the reliability of the information is not subject to doubts, those who retell should enjoy authority among the listeners, then they can present a subjective opinion as objective, that is, as truth. As a result, listeners do not need to torment their conscience with a choice, the choice has already been made, and it only needs to be accepted as the truth - to believe.
The means of disseminating information are used to control consumers of information, the goals of this control can be any, for example, so as not to kill each other, because then there will be no one to control. It is possible to manage nutrition, if people do not eat properly, they can get sick, and then they will be of little use. People, like other organisms, spend energy on movement, you can control this movement so that it is orderly, not chaotic, or you can direct the energy to something else. All the resources that a person has can be directed in the right direction.
The world is filled with a variety of religious denominations. Any religious denomination is just a popular sect that was able to take root, defeat other sects in a certain group of people, and then become widespread in other groups of people; therefore it can sometimes be supported even at the state level. What a sect is - this is a topic for another article.
Subject: On the meaning of life
If you ask yourself or those around you the question: what is the meaning of life, then in most cases you will get the answer that you need to achieve something. For example, build a house, plant a tree, raise children, make more money, gain recognition, travel the world, and so on. All of this is incorrect. Many people confuse the concept of goal and meaning. All of the above and all other achievements are not the meaning of life, but only individual goals. And the meaning of life is in striving for a goal, and these concepts must be separated. What should we do if the goal is achieved? We need to set a new goal for ourselves. Approximately this is the meaning of life - do not stop there and constantly set new goals for ourselves and move towards them.
If there is no goal ahead, then life does not end there, just life becomes meaningless until a new goal is found and movement towards the goal begins. This movement should be positive and creative. An organism that only consumes and destroys and creates nothing is called a virus. If we do not want to be like a virus, our movement must be positive and creative, and if we are not confused by the likeness of a virus, then we can spend our lives on consumption and destruction.
Sometimes, successful people are compared to sharks, because the shark is constantly moving, and those people who are constantly moving towards something, eventually succeed. But man is not a shark, it is necessary to make forced stops for sleep, eating, and rest. And this is not bad, because even when sleeping, a person moves towards the goal. The purpose of sleep is to get enough sleep, the purpose of eating is to get energy for movement, the purpose of rest is to gain strength for movement, because if there is no strength, then there will be no opportunity to move forward. It is necessary to spend no more time on rest than will be enough to continue moving, if more time is spent on rest, it will be a pointless waste of time. The right balance between movement and rest will have to be determined by yourself.
Subject: The most valuable things are given for free
Love, health, knowledge - this is what is given for free and at the same time is the most valuable thing. Perhaps this list can be expanded, I give you this opportunity.
Love cannot be taken, love can only be received. We love not for something; we love despite and no matter what. No matter how badly children behave, parents will still love them, even if it seems to children that this is not so. A loving person will forgive everything and give everything to his beloved. Love is a sacrifice, you cannot take it, but you can refuse it, and we are allowed to decide whether to accept or reject this priceless gift. Love cannot be created, but it can be sown, and it is not given to us to predict what will grow out of this, or maybe nothing will grow.
In Russian, we often say “I love”, although the meaning is correct to say “I like”, and one needs to understand: I really love or just like it. It is also important to understand the difference between love and infatuation. Infatuation describes feelings for the ideal that we created in our minds, when we have not yet met the object of love well enough, invented and fell, and this feeling can disappear when we find out that the one by which we created the ideal is different from this ideal. The effect of infatuation is usually short.
Several words in Greek describe love, one of which can be translated as friendship. Friendship could be attributed to an invaluable gift, but here a lot depends on us, friendship is not given for free, friendship must be earned. Friends, pals, and good acquaintances are different concepts, and it is necessary to separate these concepts. There can't be friendship between a man and a woman, relations between a man and a woman can be at the level of friendship, but if the value of communication increases, and then the relationship will move to the level of intimacy. A friendship between women is a political move, they can only be friends against a common enemy, but in the absence of such, relations can be maintained, at best, at the level of companions, or over time they can turn into a confrontation. Men are more naive about this, they can be friends without seeking to benefit.
Health is given for free. We can spend efforts to improve health, and for this, we do not need money. You can spend a lot of money on maintaining health if it is damaged, but this will not return the lost health, we can only realize that the next loss for our health may be critical.
Knowledge is an invaluable gift, and it is simply stupid to refuse it. Knowledge is not just information; it is processed information ready for use. The difference in value between information and knowledge is the same as between a diamond and a polished diamond. You can spend a lot of money on education, but you still don't get knowledge. We can get knowledge only voluntarily, no one can force us to learn except ourselves. We alone can open our minds to knowledge.
The claim that repetition is the mother of learning is wrong. Thoughtless memorization does not lead to understanding. Training develops skills, but it is not learning. In the process of learning, the meaning opens, and if you repeat the same thing several times, the meaning will not open. Perhaps a saying will be appropriate here: no matter how long you say "sweetness", your mouth will not become sweeter. Understanding comes when we can retell the meaning in other words - in our own words, and the meaning does not change. With our words, we can pass the acquired knowledge to someone else at any time.
Subject: Pity is Weakness
The sign of death is the absence of signs of life. Pain is one of the signs of life. To make sure that the organism is rather alive than dead, you can check whether there is a reaction to external stimuli, whether the organism can perceive pain. If the organism does not perceive pain, it means that one sign of life has been lost, and the organism is more dead than alive.
The organism uses pain as an indicator of problems, a signal that it needs attention. If you turn off this alarm, the organism cannot heal itself. Medicines can help, but the organism must heal itself.
The organism must be able to recognize the threat on time and eliminate it. The condition of the organism in which the immune system does not respond to a threat is called tolerance. If the organism does not respond to medications, this is also called tolerance.
If the pain is not severe, then one can endure, if the organism is not strong enough and cannot stand the pain, then one resorts to using pain relievers. Some pain relievers are called narcotics because they are addictive. Taking painkillers can dull pain, briefly raise the pain threshold. If the pain threshold is high, then the organism can feel only severe pain, if the pain threshold is low, then the organism begins to experience pain for any reason.
The organism tends to get used to, including to pain relievers, then to increase the pain threshold, one needs to either change the drug or increase the amount of the drug, which means increasing the dose. But it won’t work for so long, because the amount of the drug can reach a level incompatible with life, and death will occur.
Until death occurs, and there is no strength to endure pain because the body has adapted to pain relievers and experiences pain for any reason, patients begin to look for moral support, those who will sympathize with them, those who will pity them, because it is so hard for them. Patients feel sorry for themselves, sympathizers feel sorry for the sick, this is an idyll of empathy, no one is to blame, everyone is sorry, and only those who are not sorry can finish this process.
Self-pity is the last stage, only death is further.
Subject: Competition lowers morality
Morality is not conscience. Morality is a collection of generally accepted principles, that is, principles that are accepted in society, some kind of association of people. Moral principles are not laws, laws determine the punishment for violation of laws, and for violation of moral principles there is only one punishment - public condemnation, that is, condemnation by other members of society. Consequently, condemnation is limited to society. Each community of people has its morality.
Over time, morality, a collection of moral principles, can change, be supplemented by new principles, or some principles can be excluded. The principles that are adopted by the conscience of one person may coincide with generally accepted moral principles, or they may differ. If the generally accepted principles differ more from the principles of conscience than coincide, then I see two ways for such a situation to develop, either the principles of conscience are replaced by generally accepted ones, or a person will have to leave such a society so as not to torment his conscience. Leaving society is an extraordinary step, not everyone has the willpower sufficient to leave society, and some choose the path of a martyr, prefer to torment their conscience, do not change their principles, and do not accept generally accepted ones.
The generally accepted principles and principles of conscience have a common feature; they can change under the influence of external conditions. When it is comfortable, society and a person can collect a large load of moral principles - to raise the level of morality, and under the influence of a threat, they get rid of unnecessary principles - lower the level of morality.
Like any other organism, a person is looking for his place under the sun, and if something threatens this place, then he needs to look for another place under the sun or fight for what he has found. In such a struggle, a person lowers the number of his principles, uses the adage "in war, all means are good." If such a struggle becomes generally accepted, that is, everyone must fight for their place under the sun, then society will get rid of generally accepted moral principles.
Subject: Everybody's playing
If you think that only children play games, you are mistaken, adults play games too. It's just that adults take their games seriously, and, by the way, children also take their games seriously. Try to convince your child that this is just a game without interrupting the game, or try to convince him to do something without playing.
“Our whole life is a game,” the statement is incorrect; life is a lot of games that we play. Family, work, war, politics, education - these are also games that we play. This doesn't mean that it should not be taken seriously. The World Cup is a very important game, the Olympic Games are even more important, but that doesn't stop them from being games.
Any interaction between people, any relationship is a game with its own rules. The rules of any game can be changed, and there is no need to stop the game to do so.
Each game has its own rules, for violations of which penalty points are charged or disqualification or exclusion from the game may follow. Besides, you can leave the game voluntarily. You can create your own game, for this, you need to establish the rules of the game. When creating your own game, you can borrow the rules from another game. You can join another game, you can exit the game, we can make these decisions on our own, or someone can make this decision for us.
If we want to increase our chances of winning, then before joining the game, it is necessary to study the rules of the game. You can try to increase your chances by breaking the rules; it will turn out to be a game within the game, breaking the rules so as not to receive penalty points or to avoid disqualification. There can be several games inside one game, each of which can also have its games; the number of nesting levels is unlimited. And even the biggest game we can imagine can only be part of an even bigger game.
Learning the rules helps to create a winning strategy, but when creating a strategy, you also need to consider that other players will follow their strategy. In addition, preparing a strategy is not enough; it is necessary to implement it, play it. In addition, preparing a strategy is not enough; it is necessary to implement it, play it. Whether our strategy will help to win we won’t know until we play.
Alexandr Soloviov
The year 2021 from Dionysius the Small according to the Gregorian calendar