August 18, 1998 marked the 50th anniversary of the US NSC Directive 20/1. Goals set in this Directive was practically achieved: the country was destroyed, the army and industry were destroyed, the people were dying out. And here the question naturally arises: why did this happen?
To answer this question, it is necessary to recall why the Great October Revolution won the socialist revolution.
Because the prevailing ideology at that time was opposed by a more powerful ideology, which won, despite the fact that there were no modern means of communication and information, and in every village there was a priest.
And in late 80s, the complete domination of Marxist ideology and 18 million members of the CPSU were not able to prevent the collapse of the country only because they were opposed by a stronger ideology than Marxism. And the current members of the Russian Communist Party, led by Zyuganov, are doing nothing but crying about the defeat in the "cold war" and keep giving up one position after another. And the Cold War is not lost, only one of the battles in this war is lost. Zyuganov and his ilk, moaning about the defeat in the Cold War, do exactly the same as Trotsky and his supporters, and therefore their name is not communists, but Trotskyists.
The concept of "Trotskyism", entered the political lexicon of the whole world, and not only the USSR, in the 20s of the XX century. It is a figurative definition of a certain human essence and reality, which was inherent in humanity for centuries. In fact, for the first time in real history, this was recorded on the example of the capture of the Achaean Union of the city-state of Troy. To achieve this goal, the Achaeans used a new conquering technology, which received the conditional name "Trojan Horse". Subsequently, this name "Trojan Horse" was used to refer to the aggressive maneuver, which was not perceived by the country and the people who were subjected to aggression as a seizure.
In our era, in the era of the maximum intensity of the Cold War, which is made possible due to the great development of information technologies that provide a high degree of information circulation, the" Trojan horse" is the forms of so-called cultural cooperation. When the warring parties introduce some visible good measures into each other's social life, the implementation of which undermines the national welfare and defense capability of the country. An example of this is the foreign family planning and drug control programs, which in practice have led to an increase in the number of teenage pregnancies and drug use.
In order to understand the essence of the phenomenon of historically real Trotskyism it is necessary to examine Trotsky's activities in historical retrospect and to identify the "Trojan Horse" used by modern Trotskyism.
Let us recall the profound question asked in the film by the illiterate peasant to the comdiv (division commander) Chapaev: "Are you for the Bolsheviks or for the Communists?" The people at the level of everyday consciousness clearly distinguished between the Bolshevik-humanist practitioners and the Communists (Trotskyists)-humanist idealists. This distinction was made according to their methods of "making all mankind happy". The Trotskyists, regardless of the real needs and needs of the population, their pains and joys, methodically and systematically kindled the fire of Civil War for the whole world.
A classic example of such actions is the behavior of Trotsky personally during the conclusion of the Brest Peace, which was vital for the country and the people.
Until Stalin's death, the very name of the party was objectively determined VKP(b) — All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks). The name itself emphasized that not only in the country, but also in the world, there are other communists which are not bolsheviks. The same Trotskyist communists, people who recognize a certain elite state for themselves, whom the peasant who asked the question had in mind. They, in order to achieve their elitism, have exploited the very idea of communism — the dream of all mankind of a socially fair, humane society, where there will be no exploitation of one person by another. Therefore, they hid behind the name ‘communists’ and implemented the idea of communism, based on their own understanding and their own goals. Therefore, a small addition of the word "(bolsheviks)" introduced a radically new concept of what people belonging to THIS party implement, and that was radically different from what the minority — the elite - implements, since the majority - the people - have their own idea of social justice. Therefore, the change in the name of the party after Stalin's death from the CPSU(b) to the CPSU is not so much a linguistic change in the name, but rather an exposure of the class essence that replaced the Stalinist leadership of the USSR, which expressed the interests of the majority of the people, by a leadership that is an expression of abstract humanism (by Trotskyists) , achieving its own crowd-"elite" goals.
Trotskyism is a feature of the psyche, not a feature of a particular ideology. The mental type of a Trotskyist can be accompanied by a variety of ideologies. It is precisely for this reason — of a purely psychic nature — that relations with Trotskyism and Trotskyists personally at the level of intellectual discussion, arguments and counterarguments are fruitless and dangerous for those who consider Trotskyism as one of the ideologies and do not see its real sub-ideological background, independent of the ideology that surrounds it.
A good example is the course of the All-Russian party discussion of 1927-28, when, instead of engaging in practical affairs to establish the economic life of the country, the Trotskyists engaged in chatter, disorienting the economic activities of the population of the whole country. And only the exile of Trotsky to Alma-Ata, and then his expulsion from the USSR, stopped the anti-people, anti-state activities of the Trotskyists in the form of open sabotage.
However, it is the organizational defeat of Trotskyism in the Soviet Union that all the "progressive" politicians of the world guilt Stalin for, as his main misdeed.
Stalin is throughout reproached for allegedly having perverted the essence of Marxism ideology, Marxist political economy, and as a result of this, we failed to get that ideal, socially just society, and were forced to move towards universal prosperity through maximum difficulties. Such a reproach was expressed in particular by the architect of Perestroika A. N. Yakovlev, who, like all modern Communists, exposes the fact that Marx is still respected by global political structures and Western economists for his specifically applied role in creating a new ideology.
The general crisis of capitalism since the time of the founders of Marxism has not gone away. It has only worsened: in its ecological expression, even if we forget for a moment about wars and rampant criminality, it brings suicide to humanity. Intellectuals, abstract humanists of the "Club of Rome" also hold this opinion. Many big financiers also agree with them, condemn capitalism in its historical form and would like to change society in some way.
Therefore, the veneration of Marx by Western politicians shows that Marx's work just did not strike a blow to the world's misanthropic slave-owning forms of management, but, on the contrary, it kept all the management points as fully as possible to continue the existence of a crowd-"elite" society. Including the basic principle to conquer world domination and to retain one's own power — the existence of a loan market usurious interest, the principle of which is most fully set out in the controlling doctrine of The Bible i.e. Deuteronomy-Isaiah.
It is a mistake to think that Marxism is an alternative to the Bible, a teaching about the world socialist revolution and the transition to communism.
Marxism as a whole is an anti-communist doctrine. It is a trap for those who seek to communism. This becomes immediately clear as soon as a person moves from believing in a Marxist tradition to analyzing its meaning, considering the practical possibilities of organizing public life and people's activities on the basis of following Marxist views. That is when all the anti-human nature comes out:
Philosophy with the basic question :" what is primary: matter or consciousness? " is harmful.
A socially useful philosophy should have as its main issue the question of methodology and perception of culture, on the basis of which the consequences of human behavior are predictable. If the main question in the worldview system is posed in some other way, then a society built on this principle loses the ability to self-govern and becomes a weapon in the hands of others.
The political economy of Marxism-Leninism was built on fictional categories that are not amenable to practical measurement in the process of economic activity of society. These are "necessary" and "surplus working time", "simple" and "complex labor", " necessary "and" surplus product" , etc., plus an error or malicious lie of Marx in the question of "Smith's dogma".
For this reason, all Marxist political economic fictions cannot be introduced into the practical accounting, which is based on the management of production and distribution at the level of micro-and macroeconomics.
One of the aphoristic definitions of socialism was given by Lenin: "Socialism means accounting and control." In relation to political economy, it means that, since in the practice of economic activity, to measure categories of the political economic science of Marxism is impossible, then accounting and control are impossible, and, as a result, neither socialism nor the transition to communism on the basis of Marxism is possible.
Thus, of the three sources, the three components of Marxism, only the doctrine remains on socialism and communism as an ideal of social life, understandable and acceptable to the working majority. In the absence of a socially useful and workable philosophy and political economy, the doctrine of communism in Marxism is simply a trap for gullible idlers who do nothing but work, for which purpose they rush into the state apparatus and creative unions subordinate to the Marxist doctrine.
This is the essence of Marxist anti-communism. The historical vocation of Marxism — under the loud speeches about social justice and equal human dignity of people, the same doctrine of "Deuteronomy-Isaiah" is implemented by default in secular forms, while the Bible and Talmud are removed from the bookshelves.
In fact, Marxism is the very "Trojan Horse", using which there was an attempt to preserve and ensure the continued longevity of existing global slave system in the modern world.
In other words, Marxism creates in its propaganda a plausible description of processes of social and economic activity, and this description is accepted by Marxists on faith without understanding, because a sane person is not able to connect the fictional categories of Marxist teaching with the reality of life.
But for the global governance structure, Marxism is indeed a new word in management theories. Marxism was originally created precisely in order to eradicate this Western-democratic social structure on its basis and replace it with another one in which it would be possible to limit and control the race of consumption characteristic of a crowd-"elite" society of the Western type. But the real masters of Marxism were never going to share their power with anyone: all they needed was an ideological, scientific " iron curtain "that would hide the system of their real power in a supposedly socialist society of"complete freedom and true people's rule." This is the role that Marxism played all the years in the USSR.
Those who grew up after 1917 not only accepted Marxism but treated it with respect, without going into his essence. Marxism stood outside criticism and did not arouse interest and discontent, not only because of the persecution of critics, but because as long as consumer peace and the growth of production were ensured, the majority of the population had no reason to doubt the correctness of the Marxist doctrine, which was allegedly clearly confirmed by the public practice. The minority, dissatisfied with Marxism as such, for various reasons (mainly "elitist" ambitions) did not develop a worldview alternative to the Bible and Marxism, which would be understandable to the common people. Due to the fact that the anti-Marxist theoretical alternative was either openly capitalist in nature, or clearly belonged to the competence of psychiatry, the repression of anti-Marxists did not cause sympathy and protest among the majority.
But now everything has changed, the vast majority of the people are convinced of this chimerical nature of Marxism and, thanks to Stalin’s politics, people received the necessary educational base, which not only developed a worldview alternative to the Bible and Marxism, but on the basis of its own philosophical methodological base also offers a new way of development, the way to build a real communism. Now people suggest, paraphrasing the words of that peasant, the question: "Are you for the Bolsheviks or are you for the Trotskyist- Marxists?»
At the same time, it should be taken into account that all conscious Trotskyists will inevitably undergo the new year of 1937, which they will hold for themselves. This is inevitable due to the nature of their psychology. And the people cannot be defeated, they are the majority. Besides "there are no fortresses that the Bolsheviks could not win" - Stalin.