"Pence against the schoolboy, or what happens if the old regime's old legacy is launched into the young new world". The main point of reading literary prize nominees of various levels, even the most prestigious ones, is to find a really good book. When I hear that modern Russian literature stagnates, does not develop, local, peripheral, provincial - I want to ask, but judge by whom? If according to the winners of the golden troika: Natzbest, Big Book, Russian Booker, yes. The point is not even that the winners are not the best things, in fact, among them are very decent ones. The matter is different, in the premium round dance for two years spinning half a dozen works of someone once recognized as the best, and the rest would not exist in nature. The conclusion is that the jury is partly incompetent, part of the maneuvers the duties. Or maybe (conspiracy theory) in such a way thin out the ranks of too diligent bourgeois writers, they say we have writers in abundance? I don't know if I'