Найти тему
Color at the end of the tunnel

The 5 most unsuccessful books I've read recently

1. Lagercrantz " The Girl in the Spider's Web"

Another book in the sequel to the long-gone Millennium by the Stig Larson. Same heroes, Salander, Blomkvist, but, but, but, but... It seems to be written on the basis of the Stig's diaries but in fact the DNA... Extremely weak and extremely weak thing. Till disgust. It is impossible to compare the books of Lagerkrantz with the first three works of authorship of Stig Larsson himself. Heaven and earth. But the deceased's family seems to want a lot of money... I do not advise you to read these books, it is better to read the cool books of Larsson himself and let Calle Blomkvist and Lisbeth Salander appear before you in all their splendor.

https://www.pinterest.ru/pin/530721137320297738/
https://www.pinterest.ru/pin/530721137320297738/

2. А. Kivinov "Fifteen days or you can complain"

To be honest, I still think Andrei Kiwinow is a good writer. Even in spite of the numerous hackneyed TV versions of his books. I remember perfectly well how in 1994, friends gave him a chance to read his book "Nightmare on Stachek Street", and with what pleasure, I read it a few more times. And then for a long time read all his works and a little familiar with the ironic and light feather of Andrei Perminov. Therefore, despite the fact that I have not read the new opuses of the author for a long time - I can say - it is not written by Kivinov. Like a simple collection of facts from the police and prosecutorial life - but not at all. I can't. Not his style. Not his language. Not his plot. And I don't believe that he could have signed up enough to give out such a shambles. So I'm pretty sure I read the work on my knee on a Friday night after 6:00 p.m. as another literary...eh, slave (let's be politically correct). Save your time - do not read :-)

3. А. Bogomolov, R. Trakhtenberg "Roma Goes to the Kremlin"

I was pretty good with Roman Trakhtenberg and some of his books. Sometimes they are very interesting. Of course, he is a very ambiguous man, but bright and extraordinary. Stupid, knowledgeable and educated. The same work came out after Roman's death and was based on his co-author. Made in the form of a kind of adventurous novel, in which Roman (sorry for the tautology) acts as a superhero, who gathers a team of heroes like him, in order to resist the world's evil with the help of anniversary rubles. In some places (very seldom) it is funny, but in general, some complete and absurd blizzard, turning into complete nonsense. And frankly speaking, it is so hard to read that it is even surprising. Very, very weak. The novel was original, but it is better to reread 5 times "You want to become a star" or "The way of the male" than this thing.

4. А. Ivanov "Club of psychological fighters".

One of my favorite domestic authors is Alexei Ivanov. His books "Heart of Parma" and "Gold of Rebellion" in spite of the complexity of language constructions I remember with pleasure. With great pleasure! Well, I thought with a sinful deed that he also hit psychology, and for the sake of curiosity decided to read this book...

Well, luckily, it's not him. To great joy. The publisher just played the real writer Ivanov and slipped the readers this... And this of course is full of tin... I really feel sorry for the people who pay for it, and most importantly, "use the advice of" the great guru "...

The book is written by the Captain, no Colonel Obviousness, who helped Lieutenant CAPSLOCK and Warrant Officer Vyvehmozgaezoterishchenko. Hardly touching the lines of this opus, I did not leave the same thought: really someone uses it? Such delirium..... And pathos is that, pathos.....

Apparently, the author spent all his creativity on the name, considering it both original and attractive. Well, I don't know what or who convinced him of that. As a man, I do not have a great desire ... ee ... to know in the biblical sense ... something masculine (fear in Russian is not as feminine, right?)

So don't even open this stuff. Just believe.

5. Trohin "We are from a scoop. Old bartender's bikes"

Not funny, stupid, weak, uninteresting. I expected something between Weller and Dovlatov - got a bump. Complete. Flair in everything. And yes, stories over the ability to tell. It doesn't matter if you make them up completely or by 75%.

Such shyster as T. Dorsey's "Don't wake a sleeping spin horn", S. Hunter's "The Third Bullet", Sardou's "The Glitter of God" and J. M. Thibaud's "The Last Prophecy" almost reached the "shameful five".

Although, for the sake of justice, all of the worst books listed above are, of course, very weak, such "epic" works as most of Henry Rollins' books or K. Kassler's "Sahara" is far away. They haven't broken the bottom yet :-)))) Well, I don't remember some books at all. For epic fale.

That's about right. And the worst books you've read lately. Interesting.

Have a nice time of day.