Philosophy before Wittgenstein speaks of the nature of language, and philosophy afterwards of the nature of thinking.
The essence of the Wittgenstein idea is to discover
1: Language is a way of thinking
2: Transforming the sentence into a reality is useful for thinking. In fact, I wrote an article about figurative thinking in my way of thinking - figurative thinking. The earliest study of language probably comes from Augustine's confession, followed by the book of Conacia, the theory of the origin of human knowledge. Wittgenstein quotes excerpts from Augustine's book. Personal feeling: If Wittgenstein hadn't been under the influence of Russell to be able to conduct research from the perspective of traditional philosophy and linguistics, it might have been much more.
Logical philosophy:
1.1 The world is a sum of facts, not a sum of things.
1.1 The world is a sum of facts, not things. Here are the facts: there is a chair in the house (this is the state), things here mean chairs. Although the world is made up of facts, we are actually thinking about things. So, what is the so-called atomic fact? Is it a chair in the house? When I witnessed the state of this chair, this fact actually contained a lot of content.
The so-called concept, here is the noun: the chair. It contains many connotations: material, color, origin, brand, owner. A copy of this chair can be permanently added. Thus, the atomic fact does not exist, and learning a language with a logical notation is in itself the wrong choice. Language is a way of thinking, that is, a brief image of reality, an abstraction.
However, you can understand the above, and there is an abstract impression of what this hit is doing, and this indicates what the language is doing. There is a grammatical component to it, there is a fact that we have agreed to the usual picture and the presence of conformity of sentences. Because logic philosophy studies the essence of language, i.e. the correspondence of grammar and reality.
This can really start from a linguistic point of view. The essence of language is actually quite simple. The classification of different ways of doing things, combined with the use of imaginary words, makes it possible to clearly describe the actions of the outside world. In fact, because German is a native language of Wittgenstein, learning the language must be very simple, because the grammar of the German language is very well developed and the sentence is very clear. In addition, there is Italian grammar that makes the difference between the different action screens very clear.
To speak Italian correctly, the idea must be very clear. How to distinguish the direction of action, the means of word generation, I think, should be quite random, as an additive, because many imaginary words simultaneously perform several grammatical functions. The description of the inner world actually uses images of the outer world to make a metaphor, for example: history is an abstract noun. We describe the course of history metaphorically: the long river of history rolls forward.
Cambridge University, UK The way of thinking is clear, the logic of natural conversation is good.
Pictures of good sentences naturally require good grammar. Let's compare some sentences in Chinese: it goes to the market to buy food. The company commander went and asked the instructor to answer the call. The first offer of cycling means that buying food is the goal, the actual action is to drive the car to the market. If it is Korean, the first two are idiomatic, and cycling is the actual action. The second sentence is even a long action, please, to answer the phone is the goal. The reason why there is a so-called binding and linguistic analysis is actually that the sense of time is too bad.
Wittgenstein's philosophical research is the essence of thinking. So, from the point of view of philosophical epistemology, we have to draw a transcendent range of human cognition before an empirical intelligence equivalent to the axioms of Euclidean geometry, we discuss the innate ability of a person to acquire learning. Transcendent abilities that I personally understand include: size, quantity, movement, internal and external innate ability to judge. The process of obtaining language from reality by confirming a person's innate ability to learn to judge is the end of the process of reconciling the elements of language with the real world. It is similar to the process of deriving the geometry theorem.
It can be called a linguistic study of the essence of thinking, more rational than the approach that Wittgenstein in his book of philosophical studies does not get tired of looking for complex examples of language thinking processes.