This Bloomberg was also the first time that he suggested that travel can and create another world, other creatures - spirits, angels, demons, elves, house and other cleanliness and impurities. It is he who owns a postulate unprecedented for that time on boldness about the "consciousness of animal movement".
However, being afraid of his own heresy, the monk returned to the dogma of the primacy of human relations with God. However, later the famous zoologist and mystic Phaserland, relying on "variations of Blomberg", formulated the idea that "all creatures have a mind, and therefore the right to a conscious path.
As for Blomberg, the monk completed his own journey on earth at the age of ninety-three. Nothing but a single treatise, no longer created, he inspired more than one generation of metaphysicists. He pushed a myriad of travelers and seekers - from Amundsen to Aurobindo - into action. The paradox - but one of the greatest travelers of mankind lived in a monastery all his life, only sometimes getting out of it for shopping in the nearest village.
In the second half of the twentieth century, a professor at the University of Geneva, François Belanger, a staunch supporter of Lin Peng, rejected the compromise that the Franciscan tried to reach. Pete Stout, a Cambridge biologist, turned into his opponent, and a struggle began.
The fierce Francois rallied the so-called new infinitaries near him. The professor was obese and unclimbed, preferring his office to conference travels. On the contrary, Dr. Stout, this true palladine of the opposite idea was a living embodiment of Mr. Sommer. A long, bent like a nail in turtle glasses, with a backpack behind his back, the doctor was tirelessly driving around the planet. Pete's bald head flashed at all the symposia and conventions where his supporters gathered. In addition, Stout was an ardent follower of Futherland theory.
Belange categorically opposed his enemy's attempts to attribute to the beasts and birds at least some sense of movement.
"One must be extremely naive," he raged in the article "Foolishness or idiocy" (Journal of Philosophy, May 1967), "to recognize the rest of nature as something that the Lord gave only to man. Let us leave aside the supreme intellect, which is undoubtedly inherent in the multitude of angels. Let us not argue with the evil intellect of Satanic powers. But to assert that the natural instincts that make ducks fly every year are based on reason, means to reach a point where they know what to do, to fall into some touching childhood, not to recognize neither reality nor facts at all! It is incomprehensible to my mind when people with scientific degrees, being in common sense, start suddenly to argue (and where! on the pages of the scientific press, in respected journals) about the fact that ants and lemmings are driven by human desires! Isn't that why ad absurdum isn't it the attempt of some philosophers-zoologists to prove that there is a certain "animal language" and other manifestations of what we used to consider to be the prerogative of our mind, given to us by God himself?
It is no wonder that Futherland still has the honor of such gentlemen to this day! Delusional experiments are being carried out, and opuses are being written that disprove Paul and his reflexes, in other words, there is nonscientific nonsense, obscurantism and quackery. All these figures claim that animals and insects are inherent in the idea. What should I say to that? I am not going to say for the thousandth time after all the great minds that ad incunadulis mind is the most important gift of God to his only beloved child, who only brings him closer to the Creator, and only he can realize the joy of infinity!
"It is even more funny to believe in elves and fauns! - The tireless Belange wrote in his other article, "Impregnable Marasmus" (also Herald, 1969). - Ad imo pectore leaves the writers with the right to fantasize on such topics. However, what scientist, if, of course, he is in his right mind and memory, will prove not only the existence of invisible verses, simply put, spirits, but also their completely human perception of the world? The magical inhabitants of the mountains and valleys, all these cobolds and mermaids, nothing more than nonsense, a game of imagination, the fruit of fears that came to us from paganism ..."