According to sentiment theory, emotions such as fear are determined by a loosely coupled response group in three different response systems, namely subjective experience (e.g., perceived state), physiological activity (e.g., accelerated heart rate), and explicit behavior or behavior. Impulsiveness (e.g. avoidance) is essential for emotional phenomenology.
In addition, according to the multidimensional concept of emotions, emotional states are organized around several basic dimensions. The most commonly accepted measurement methods are valence (comparison between pleasure and dissatisfaction), excitement (sometimes called activation, contrast between low and high excitement), and motivation for avoidance (contrast state is prone to Exiting the tendency to be a characteristic state interaction;
Often, the emotional expressions in different response systems are weakly related to individuals and to time.
To some extent, this lack of correlation only reflects the fact that our measurements are not completely ideal (i.e., simple measurement errors). However, some differences are also related to the fact that the metrics of the activities in the three response systems reflect the different fundamental dimensions of the organizational emotional state.
Subjective experience is particularly sensitive to potency and excitement; physiological indicators used in fear formation studies are usually sensitive to arousal or potency but are only sensitive at high levels of arousal.
The apparent tendency of behavior or action primarily reflects the motive component of emotion. Although some emotional theory believes that these three components are equally important components of emotions
Some people even think that behavioral tendencies are the core of emotions because the ultimate function of emotions is to control behavior.
Similarly, emotional disorders are essentially behavioral disorders: the tendency to avoid behavior is one of the diagnostic criteria for many anxiety disorders (American Psychiatric Association, 2000), and the causal model suggests a tendency to avoid or avoid threats (whether successful or not) Whether it is converted to explicit behavior) can lead to support and/or exacerbate phobia.
Therefore, research on behavioral trends is critical to understanding when and how to make adaptive fears go wrong. However, studies that define human fear often determine subjective experiences (seeking to report verbal fears or expectations in the United States), physiology (measuring physical responses, such as changes in skin conductance or enhancement of reflexivity), or both. This usually does not apply to the trend of movement caused by the stimulus.
In the defense, research is defined as an area. It has recently been found that escaping is an important research topic, but it mainly involves the operation principle and representative structure of controlling escape and escape behavior.
As a manifestation of fear itself, the shift of avoidance tendencies to the initial neutrality of human fear formation has not yet attracted people's interest. We only know one exception in the literature. ( In this study, participants were allowed to move freely in two of the three virtual environments without shocks, predictable shocks, or unpredictable shocks. The results showed that participants strongly favored the direction without stress In the case of avoiding unpredictable shocks, further work in this direction seems to be timely.
