7. Why do astrology of different genres have such a big difference with each other?
Astrologers seem to have differences on several basic issues of astrology: whether the precession of the Earth's axis should be considered (see box below), how many planets and celestial bodies should be referenced, and most importantly, which personality traits and which The astronomical phenomena correspond to each other and there are many different opinions. Read 10 constellation columns, or consult 10 astrologers, and you may get 10 interpretations.
If astrology is as scientific as its proponents claim, why did the astrologer not come up with a well-recognized theory after thousands of years of data collection and interpretation corrections? Different scientific viewpoints tend to be consistent after long-term comparison with experiments and other evidence. In contrast, a system based on superstition or personal beliefs will gradually differentiate in the acquisition of power, money, and fame by practitioners.
8. If the influence of the constellation is embodied in a known force, then why is the planet dominant?
If the effects of astrology can be attributed to gravitational, tidal or magnetic influences (each with a different astrological proposition), then any physics student who is just getting started can calculate the factors that affect a newborn's fate. Roger Culver and Philip Ianna listed many of these aspects in the co-authored Astrology: True or False (1988, Prometheus Books). example. For example, when an obstetrician delivers a baby, his gravitational pull on the baby is six times that of Mars, and the tidal force is about 200 billion times that of Mars. The doctor may be much smaller in quality than the red planet, but his position is much closer to the newborn!
9. Conversely, if the influence of the constellation is embodied in an unknown force, why is it not affected by distance?
All the distance forces we know in the universe will decrease as the distance between objects increases. However, in the Earth-centered system that astrology was introduced thousands of years ago, the influence of celestial bodies is completely independent of distance. Mars, whether it is on the same side of the Sun as the Earth, or on the other side of the Sun 7 times farther away, has exactly the same effect in your star phase. If there is a force that is unaffected by distance, it will be a revolutionary scientific discovery, and many of our basic concepts will change.
10. If the influence of the celestial body is not restricted by distance, why is there no astrology based on stars, galaxies and quasars?
The French astronomer Jean-Claude Pecker pointed out that astrologers only play skills in the solar system's celestial bodies, which is too narrow. In addition to our small sun, moon and planets, there are trillions of huge celestial bodies in the universe that should also affect us. In a guest's astrology, there are fewer pilgrimages, crab-like nebula pulsars, and Andromeda galaxies. Is his nebula complete?
The solar system is only a very small corner of the universe. Is there a trillions of huge celestial bodies outside the solar system that should not be considered by astrologers?
Test astrology
Even on all of the above issues, the astrology network is open, recognizing that the influence of the astrology is beyond the current understanding of the universe, we can finally give a fatal blow to astrology: in a word, it does not work. Many rigorous tests have proven that astrology is good, but it does not predict anything.
After all, when we judge something that is not effective, we don't need to know its principles. In the past ten or twenty years, astrologers have been too busy to have statistically validated their work, and physicists and social scientists have had to do it. Here are a few representative studies.
Bernard Silverman, a psychologist at Michigan State University, collected 2,978 birthdays for newcomers who are about to marry in Michigan, and 478 birthdays for couples who are about to divorce. Most astrologers claim that in terms of interpersonal relationships, they can at least predict which constellations match and which do not. But Severman contrasts these predictions with actual marital status, only to find that the two are not relevant. For example, the gender of a "constellation mismatch" is equal to the probability of marrying each other with the "constellation match".