Найти тему

The invasive nature of politics and the monopoly on power and confidence in the use of force. (Part 2)

Photo from https://cdn.pixabay.com/photo/2015/04/11/18/11/mount-rushmore-718028_960_720.jpg
Photo from https://cdn.pixabay.com/photo/2015/04/11/18/11/mount-rushmore-718028_960_720.jpg

The invasive nature of the Directive

The invasive nature of politics is one of the signs of totalitarian superpower aimed at global and comprehensive expansion: territorial, economic, political, cultural and spiritual. US policy is based on the assumption that, to become a superpower, a country must oppress and conquer other nations and manipulate their destiny for its own interests.

Bush's January 2002 federal embassy speech was one of the most threatening and aggressive in American history. The President of the United States outlined a program of limitless and endless warfare on every continent and against every regime that stands in the way of the American ruling class.

This message has indeed become a program for conquering the world and establishing world domination over the United States, similar to Hitler's actions.

Like Hitler, Bush demonstrates his vision of a world where small and weak states pose a deadly threat to the most powerful and demanding nation. In 1938-1939, Hitler demonized Czechoslovakia and then Poland as a threat to German national security before occupying and destroying each of these countries. In 2002, Bush addressed North Korea, Iran and Iraq, saying, "The United States of America will not allow the most dangerous regimes in the world to threaten us with the most destructive weapons in the world.

The economic expansion of the United States, accompanied by political and military expansion, has spread to the world.

This combination of economic and military expansion has been demonstrated in the last quarter century by the example of US policy in the Middle East focused on controlling oil resources. Among the US measures in the Middle East: (1) The 1953 revolution in Iran financed by the CIA, which eliminated the leftist Moossadik regime and restored the dictatorship of the Shah; (2) the US invasion of Lebanon in 1958; (3) the large-scale armament of the Israeli state and the gross disregard for the aspirations of the Palestinian people; (4) US economic, military and political support for a semi-feudal absolute monarchy in Saudi Arabia; (5) the bombing of Beirut by US warships in 1983; and (6) the beginning of the war against Iraq in 1991, followed by the imposition of a sanctions regime that cost the lives of several hundred thousand people.

A monopoly on strength and dependence on violence

Another sign of totalitarian superpower is the monopoly on the use of force and the dependence on violence, which becomes the main instrument of global dictatorship and control.

In his speech to the West Point Academy on June 1, 2002, President Bush presented his strategy in which he outlined the United States' intention to monopolize the right to unlimited use of military force on a global scale. Speaking to future officers, the head of the White House said that the United States can no longer rely on the deterrence of other countries to attack with the threat of massive retaliation and that it must be the first to take action against identified enemies.

Bush also noted that the U.S. nation must "uncover terrorist cells in more than 60 countries," about one-third of the world. "We must shift the fight to the enemy's territory, destroy its plans and counteract the most serious threats before they actually arise. In the world we have entered, the only way to security is action. And my country will act.

This speech clearly showed the dominance of power in US politics and how the US government represents America's new role in the post-September 11 world. Bush said that not only will the United States unilaterally proactively deploy its forces where and when they want to, but the nation will also punish those who engage in terrorism and aggression and try to impose a clear moral of good and evil on the world. This speech was programmatic in nature. It brought together a number of positions that were described by senior US government officials as the "Common Security Framework".

At the same time, violence is used not only to protect against threats or security, but also to create a new world order along American lines, to gain global political, economic and spiritual power and hegemony. Bush put it this way: "The business of our nation has always been more than the defense of our nation. And then he picked out three goals that the White House called the "three starter waves" of its foreign policy. He said that the United States should "strive to protect world peace from terrorist and tyrannical threats, preserve that peace through good relations between the great powers, and expand that peace by promoting free and open societies on every continent.

These arrogant statements by the President of the United States on the protection, maintenance and expansion of peace are evidence of the global aspirations of the United States, which have become a political dictate and have recently been implemented primarily through the use of force.

To be continued ...