Unexpectedly, it isn’t the mystery that’s the highlight of The Hound of the Baskervilles; it’s the cast. Ian Richardson, in particular, stands out as one of the interpretations of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s legendary detective. When an ancient family curse in the form of a ghostly hound frightens Sir Charles Baskerville (David Langton) to death, Sherlock Holmes (Richardson) and Dr. John Watson (Donald Churchill) investigate. His sole heir, Sir Henry (Martin Shaw) now fears for his life. An unbeliever in the supernatural, Holmes turns his attention to the other inhabitants of the Baskerville House,. I’ve read a fair amount of Sherlock Holmes’ adventures and seen some of the more notable adaptations. Not knowing the mystery behind The Hound of the Baskervilles, I found it entertaining to solve. As a film, it isn’t air-tight, largely due to the amount of screentime given to the various suspects. Based on this, you can, unfortunately, sort of figure out who is most likely to be the culprit