The past needs to be known not because it has passed, but because when it leaves, it does not know how to remove its consequences.
V. О. Klyuchevsky
The essential purpose to reconstruct the past, that historical science has been involved in, has never changed. At all times, the authorities at a certain historical stage had to form such a view of the past in order to justify not only the system of power imposed on people, but also their own position and concrete actions arising from it. Such historical "science" always comes to the forefront with scientists who go with the current and subtly respond to publicly undisclosed demands. A skilful solution to this conjunctual problem would be to effectively select an entire mass of events and facts that can be put into the required version as the initial factual material, to give the material an appropriate interpretation and attribute to the reconstructed processes cause-and-effect conditions and relationships requested by the political moment.
In addition, it is popular to use "archival material" to support certain historical myths.
We had a conversation with one of the specialists whose job was to populate certain texts into forms with a Stalin's resolution printed on it. After that, it is hard to exclude inadvertent use of these documents in the media and for different political purposes. The question of how to distinguish the truth from a lie is what everyone must decide for himself, without trusting some imaginary authorities and "authentic archive materials". This is why God has given us the sixth and seventh senses: the discernment and the sense of measure.
In terms of the influence on the fate of society, the previous four precedences (ideology, economics, genetics and military weapons) are inferior to the historical precedence. In reality, it is not the one who has a beautiful and important name plate on his door, but the one who has the opportunity to order information of chronicle nature, to change and rewrite facts of past historical events, to review events in terms of "good" or "bad", as well as to assess those historical figures who made these events.
Our time has one peculiarity: history gets multiple times rewritten during a lifetime of one generation. For us, the same past is depicted as pink, grey or black - these are manifestations of the global conceptual power manoeuvres and the attempts of a subordinate mob to oppose to brainwashing done by the conceptual power periphery.
Thus, if we look at Stalin as if he was a villain with some clinical thirst for power, as we are all compelled to do by media, then the next generation will lose all the algorithms of adequate controlling developed by our society under his leadership. If we consider Stalin a great organiser of a super-power state, then the algorithms to reconstruct the post-war country, the phenomenon of Stalin's price reduction period within 1947-1953 should be studied in schools and universities. And this is just one of many episodes of history, which is impossible to adequately understand without the notion of objectivity of Good and Evil as social phenomena.
Demonization of Stalin is connected with his understanding of the conceptual power, which was alternative to both the church and marxist version of the Deuteronomy Isaiah Doctrine. And this fact had to be hidden from society by the rulers, that control the both branches of the Doctrine of "Deuteronomy - Isaiah". Any historical conclusions and assessments made, including those based on reliable factual material, are subjective and morally conditioned. They always express the authors' world view and the concept to which they are committed. They say that history is what historians have agreed on and what they mean as "a matter of course".
Still, this is only the first part of the truth, because historians do not agree on their own. The role of the mastermind, the role of the methodological level of controlling and the system of conceptual power are not revealed in these assessments. In the Pisces era, the only views published in large pressruns were those that, in all their diversity, did not go beyond the Doctrine of Deuteronomy - Isaiah, which dominates societies, a doctrine to enslave the mankind on behalf of God. Our task is to change these traditions.
Chronological precidence makes it possible to link phenomena that have been torn apart in people's social consciousness into a single whole. If you understand that Darwin wrote at the same time as Marx and sent his works to the latter with inscriptions, then you will comprehend the mechanisms of how to pervert the reality. It was this tandem that plunged mankind into materialistic atheism, leading them away from understanding the idea of the Single God for all people - the Creator and Almighty (even though Darwin himself believed in God).
1 'explaining the origin of life on Earth only by chance is like explaining the origin of a dictionary by an explosion in a printing shop. The impossibility to admit that the wonderful world with human conscious beings appeared by chance seems to be the most important proof of God's existence. The world rests on regularities and in its manifestations it appears as a product of a certain mind which proves there is the Creator" ("Komsomolskaya Pravda", 30.10.2007, in the article by Svetlana Kuzina "God lives in another universe?").
If the Doctrine of Deuteronomy - Isaiah is regarded as 'evil', then Stalin did good according to the circumstances, as much as he could and understood. That is why he cannot be fairly judged by all the followers of this doctrine and all its slaves, both existing and potential - those who do not have and do not want to have an idea of the conceptual power as a social phenomenon and the role of this phenomenon in world history.
The annalistic perversions of Christ's prophecies are reflected in "The Master and Margarita" by M.A. Bulgakov. During interrogation conducted by Pontius Pilate, Yeshua testified about chroniclers like Levi Matthew: "He walks behind me with a caprine parchment and writes continuously. But I looked into his parchment once and was terrified. No doubts, I said nothing of what is written on it". Thus, such evangelical chroniclers have kept it secret, that the churches of the name of Christ, by perverting true covenants of Jesus, have been violating the mankind for two thousand years, having themselves split into numerous creeds and sects. It is truely said: divide and rule. To those who disagree with such an assessment of their activities because of prejudices that have developed (not by themselves), the question is: what have historically real churches done to implement the following commandment of Christ: "25 .... But Jesus called them unto him, and said, Ye know that the princes of the Gentiles exercise dominion over them, and they that are great exercise authority upon them. 26 But it shall not be so among you: but whosoever will be great among you, let him be your minister; 27And whosoever will be chief among you, let him be your servant:)?
For a meaningful analysis of the present and future, it is necessary to understand world history, at least since the time of the Ehnaton religious reform (1375-1325 BC) and the subsequent concealment of its essence from humanity by the ancient Egyptian hierarchy of Amon and the present successors of its work, rather than to quietly slobber over contemplating the sculptural portrait of Ehnaton's wife Nefertiti. We are launching mechanisms to depress these deep-rooted legends. This is because the concept that has prevailed for over three thousand years is losing its power due to the Law of Time. This period was anticipated by the ancient Egyptian ill-thinkers and they called it the Apocalypse, but this is not the collapse of mankind, what they were convinced of.
It is the collapse point of the mob-elitist system that has prevailed throughout history. The problems of today's ill-thinkers are those, as bolshevik L. M. Kaganovich pointed out in one of his interviews, that "they do not understand the Law of Time".
Many people who have come into contact with our information for the first time ask questions about the proof of some ideas regarding history, about the Universe, about God. There is no need to get your hopes up on primitive experimental-logical schemes of proof: not everything in life can be repeated experimentally, and not everything can be put into logic. Everyone who has been given the Discernment from Above can find the truth for themselves, by comparing, thinking, analyzing. It is the exclusive right of a reader himself or herself to treat what is written with critic. After all, this also applies to any other issues.
One can believe, for example, the official version of Hitler's suicide, or one can believe Stalin's phrase: "Hitler escaped from the judgment of nations" - or the well-known numerous testimonies that Eve and Hitler left Germany in time due to separate negotiations between the Reich and the headquarters of global military and terrorist operations - Great Britain - the true organizer of both World Wars of the 20th century. After all, in addition to the so-called "Washington body" in the executive branch of the Western civilisation, there is also the "London body", which is responsible for the project of bourgeois liberalism, and there is also its Paris subdivision, which is responsible for all "left", pseudo-socialist projects. Puppets such as Hitler, who perfectly fulfilled everything prescribed by the conceptual power, are always carefully guarded by the latter. Otherwise it will be difficult for the security services to recruit another ben laden. That is why the most likely version would be that Hitler and his entourage settled safely in Chile among the Indians and lived peacefully in the countryside with no hassle. Indirect proof of Hitler's innocence in the eyes of global policy makers is that he was not charged in absentia or posthumously at the Nuremberg Tribunal, unlike other criminals.
One can believe in Goebbels' version of the 1940 shooting of about 15000 Polish officers in the Smolensk camps of the NKVD (People's Commissariat for Internal Affairs), which became official at the instigation of M.S. Gorbachev and A.N. Yakovlev, or one can think about some inconsistency of this version. Before the occupation, the area where the graves of Poles are located was not closed, it was a resting place for Smolensk people, pioneer camps, a NKVD rest house and under the Germans it was closed. Why were the hands of the corpses bound with paper twine, which was not produced in the USSR at the time, but was produced in Germany? Why were regular German weapons used in the shootings and not Soviet ones? Why was it the first time in its practice that the NKVD carried out a shooting without taking documents out of the Poles' chest pockets? (see: Yuri Mukhin, "Katynsky Detective").
In addition, it is useful to remember that after the Munich conspiracy (autumn 1938), Poland (i.e. these very officers) together with fascist Germany participated in the liquidation of Czechoslovakia. That is, if take it with honour and conscience, Poland was not the first victim of World War II in the 20th century, but one of the aggressors who started it. And before its military collapse in 1939, the blue dream of the Polish leadership was a war together with Germany and other countries of "civilised Europe" against the USSR. Throughout its existence, this strategic task for the Polish "elite" has led to the upbringing of an officer corps during the pre-war period. The only problem was that Great Britain and Hitler deceived these hopes of that "elite". In the meantime, the state of historical science demonstrates that the more the seals and signatures will push forward one of the historical versions, the more there is reason to doubt its authenticity for those who seek to reflect on the true global history of mankind based on facts.