Unlimited wealth is great poverty.
Aristotle
It would be a miracle if someone could lead a rich country like Russia to impoverishment.
K. Yung
We reviewed the sixth and fifth precedences of supranational controlling. They are tied to the fourth economic precedence. The population of Russia, one of the richest countries in the world, so far is living poorer than some western countries as a result of isolation (bypassing public consciousness) from the alien conceptual power. We have a full range of minerals, raw materials, oil and gas reserves, a unique energy system, highly educated population, and qualified middle-level managers. So what's the problem? We do not have one thing and that is a concept to use all of the above for the benefit of common people on the basis of a single program-oriented approach. Instead, due to the ‘ellite’ that demonstrates lack of understanding and declares good intentions, we undergo a hostile concept of controlling. Its essence does not need to be searched in the archives of the western intelligence services, it is openly and clearly stated in the Bible and sets the owners of the concept on ways to financially enslave entire countries and peoples and to destroy those who disagree with such a policy expressed as a doctrine in "Deuteronomy-Isaiah»:
"You shall not give your brother any silver, or bread, or anything else that can be given as a loan; you shall give a foreigner as a loan, but you shall not give your brother as a loan" (Deuteronomy 23:19).
"...and you will lend to many nations, but you will not borrow [and you will rule over many nations, but they will not rule over you] " (Deuteronomy 28:12).
"Then the sons of strangers will build your walls, and their kings will serve you... and the people and kingdoms that will not serve you will perish, and such nations will be utterly destroyed" (Isaiah 60:10-12).
The result of this global legalized theft is given in the literature (Kennedy M., "Money without interest and inflation", Sweden, 1993). Today's Russia is a living monument to the omnipotence of this doctrine of financial slavery. Compare the "help" that is being provided to us and the treasures that are being siphoned out of us through Eurodollar issuance, loan interest, and wealth redistribution schemes based on this. And this is done by the hands of our own credit and financial system, which, under the banner of integration, performs the function of a software-adaptive module for the transnational banking corporation, skillfully implemented in our statehood.
If we turn to the Koran, we will understand why the whole world is being frightened by an abstraction called "Islamic fundamentalism", instilling a thoughtlessly negative attitude towards Islam and, ultimately, to the Koran. The fact is that on the economic precedence the Koran directly opposes the Bible and regards lending money at interest as a most serious sin. Those who eat the usury will not rise from their graves except as one rises who is being beaten by Satan into insanity. That is because they say: “Trading is only like usury; however God has made trading lawful and forbidden usury”. But God allowed trade, and forbade usury. If any one [of the usurers] is admonished by God, and if he acts according to this admonition, then his past sins will be forgiven him" (Qur'an, Sura 2:275).
The natural growth curve is typical for the animal, plant world, and for humans. A human grows rapidly in infancy and youth, but after 20 years the growth almost stops followed only by qualitative changes in the body. Similarly, being in harmony with the Earth's biosphere, humanity should develop along with the technologies it forms. The limits of growth here are determined by restrictions from below (meeting the demographically determined needs of residents) and restrictions from above in order to avoid self-destruction of humanity (preservation of the environment, limited biosphere permissibility of development). Humanity as a single integral organism must comprehend the need for development to be limited from above, as it develops spiritually. However, today we have a situation where this monster, called human society, behaves, to put it mildly, unreasonably. It was excusable when it was a baby. But now he is engaged in self-mutilation, being, in fact, inside a unique spacecraft, with a sledgehammer it smashes one by one the life support systems of this ship.
It is caused by the desire for linear growth, when the criterion of civilization and development is not the good reason, but satisfaction of degradation-parasitic needs, which is not related to the development of the Spirit. In these perverse ideas, the more machines, metal, oil, and electricity there are, the better and more civilized it is. However, humanity as a whole has long crossed the line of acceptable technological repletion and is now mindlessly following the path of linear growth solely because of problems with the Humankind reason.
In this connection, and in connection with the above-mentioned doctrine of "Deuteronomy—Isaiah", ideas about the curve of exponential growth are of particular importance. At first it seems an imperceptible growth, which at a certain stage turns into an avalanche. This scheme enables to develop a cancer when each malignant cell divides into two.
We all remember how the Persian Shah failed to fulfill, as it seemed to him, the modest request when the inventor of chess asked the shah to put one grain on the first square of the chessboard, and for each of the subsequent ones 2 times more than the previous one. The reward, based on the law of exponential growth, would be more than 400 of the world's current grain yields.
This is the kind of growth we have in the financial system that contains loan interest. Due to charging of interest and compound interest (interest on interest), the monetary capital doubles at certain intervals and has an exponential growth dynamics. In fact, loan interest is a cancer of the economic system. Every cycle of economic development simply cannot fail to end in financial or military disaster. The duration of these cycles of wealth redistribution, of going nowhere, is determined by the amount of loan interest. The time required for the first, longest, period of usurious doubling of the amount of money in circulation, when charging 3% per annum is 24 years, at 6% rate it is 12 years, at 12% — 6 years. These intervals are associated with periods of peaceful existence of mankind, the frequency of unambiguously programmed inevitable financial crises.
The reason for the crises is that the volume of production of goods and services is growing significantly slower than the spontaneous inflation of the money supply, programmed by the size of the loan interest rate. At the same time, prices increase in accordance with its level, since the loan rate affects the cost of production of the first borrower, then passes into the cost of products produced by consumers of the borrower's products, and so on along the chain of product flows. As a result, loan interest generates deliberately programmed price increase and deliberately unpaid debt, which is distributed in some way to all participants in the credit and financial system. Then the bosses of the usurers make a demand for payment of old, obviously unpayable, debts and stop lending, launching an organized crisis, which results in redistribution of ownership rights to very real objects and products that are deliberately deficit in relation to the money supply.
From these considerations, it is obvious that a credit and financial system based on loan interest, built in accordance with the doctrine of "Deuteronomy-Isaiah", can not even theoretically ensure sustainable development.
Periods of crashes and booms are associated with the amount of loan interest arbitrarily set. To finally convince the reader of incompatibility of loan interest and normal crisis-free natural development, we will give another analogy. If someone had deposited money in a bank account in the amount of 1 cent in the year of Christ's birth at 4% per annum, then in 1750 they could have accumulated the money enough to buy a gold ball the size of the Earth. In 1999, it would have had the equivalent of 8.200 such balls. Therefore, crises, bankruptcies, and wars, that allow everything to be written off, are an integral attribute of a social system that allows loan interest.
And this mechanism of self-destruction, the essence of which is quite capable to be understood even by a schoolboy, has failed to be canceled by humanity for several thousand years. This topic does not reach the minds of the "big heads" of economic science and the vast majority of politicians, and therefore they are keen to develop some other recipes to overcome the crisis, recipes that would not affect the 'sacred cow' - the global supranational institution of usury.
Is there an alternative to this obviously disastrous scenario? Of course, there is. Loan interest in the economy of the future should be replaced by a small fee for the use of money, but this time it should be charged from the person who kept it 'idle'. People who adhere to the requirements of the Qur’an voluntarily pay the state a religious tax of 2.5% per annum from the money that they have kept idle for 12 months. This scheme of using money is equivalent to the scheme of using wagons. Everyone takes money only when and to the extent that it is necessary for them in the process of socially useful work. Today, it is a means of accumulation and lucre and is distributed in the opposite way. Money is always in the possession of someone who does not need it for practical use, but only for usury.
And the above said is not idle utopianism. The experiment with interest-free money circulation was conducted in the Austrian city of Wergl during the great depression and gave amazing results in improving the efficiency of the local economy. Its essence is described in detail in the mentioned book by Marguerite Kennedy, and it was closed only because of real competition to bank usury. Similar schemes, when you had to pay for storing money, were used in Europe in the period 1000 - 1300 and produced huge public results. This European experience is described in detail in the literature (see: Lietar B. "The soul of money" — http://artifact.org.ru/detalirovka-voprosov-globalnoy-teorii/lietar-b-dusha-deneg.html etc.).
And now, after understanding the general schemes, we will proceed to consider the state of affairs in Russia. The cornerstone of the concept that works against Russia, at the level of economic precedence of controlling, is precisely the loan interest, which is the basis for schemes to generate income outside production, when money makes new money with no connection with a socially useful result. The owners of this concept thrive due to the fact that they do not allow under various plausible pretexts to print means of payment in controlled countries, provide them with no more than coloured paper or numbers in a computer, and take real material values (wood, oil, gas, gold) as interest payments and debt repayment.
Loan interest is a parameter of supranational structureless controlling, set at will. By manipulating its size, the ratio of own and borrowed capital of the country and schemes to return (for some — it could be deliberate non-return) debts you can generate any trends in the controlled countries from economic collapse (Russia in 90s) ) to prosperity (Swiss Confederation) or faux showcases of the bourgeois-liberal values (the U.S.), based on the possibilities to carry out uncontrolled emissions.
The development projects from academic science, Marxism-Leninism, the perestroika democrats, and the opposition forces serve to conceal this true mechanism of controlling. You can read hundreds of pages from the works of Marx, Zyuganov, Shafarevich, Gaidar, but you are guaranteed to never find elementary, understandable conclusions that the normal functioning of production, mired in loans, in conditions when the amount of loan interest exceeds the return on turnover of production capital, is impossible even theoretically. And all the more so, all the system "positioners" and "oppositioners" are moving away from developing and implementing an alternative to this usurious lawlessness.
Some people naively believe that since they do not take money at interest, this predatory scheme does not affect them. It is a profound mistake. It is the government, the metro, the water utility, energy, housing, trade, etc. that take loans, and therefore in any calculations there is always a component associated with the payment of interest corresponding to this or that field of activity. This fee often exceeds any tax levies. By the way, even in Germany, which is quite "moderate" in these matters, the share of total interest components in utility payments reaches 70%.
The attitude to loan interest is a litmus test, which accurately determines whether this politician really contributes to the movement of a country from ruin to prosperity or hides this path with words about welfare of people. Now try to take this into consideration and listen to the verbal nonsense of "oppositions" widely advertised on television, and you will get what these "oppositionists" are comfortably "fighting" for, you will understand who sponsors them trying to make people 'happier' .
"Brilliant" merit of Marxism controlled by the biblical doctrine is that for more than a hundred years this theory led the poor and their productive labor to a false trail of abstractions like "surplus value", "necessary" and "surplus" product, which cannot be measured in the practice of economic activities, and this inadequate terminology hid the true mechanism to ruin both owners of industrial production and hired workers through loan interest rates. Instead of eliminating this mechanism of ruin, back in 1917 a clash between administrative and productive labour representatives (who are supposed to be mutually complementary) was artificially provoked. So, a submarine moves away from the pursuing torpedo by releasing a false simulator in the direction of which the torpedo rushes.
The scenario of targeted impact on productive labor is directed and managed through the credit and financial system and the Central Bank. Moreover, the Central Bank is de jure and de facto freed from being subject to the power structures of Russia. After all, for the government there is no difference where to borrow money: from the Central Bank or from the "Rothschilds" - and, experience has shown in recent years, in the latter case, the loan will be significantly cheaper. It is obvious that the financial and economic bloc of our country is tied to the interregional supranational level of controlling. The money leaves the country in the form of investments for global financial structures at meager percentage, but almost all of it is returned in the form of bank and corporate loans, but many times more expensive. This is not unusual: the functions of an "independent" central bank in any country, where it is possible to introduce them into the state controlling system, depriving the state of the right to issue money (Treasury, Ministry of Finance, etc.) are reduced to non-disinterested work for global financial clans.
The most accurate scheme of this real supranational controlling was described by M. Rothschild: "Let me manage the country's money, and I care not who makes its laws." In a normal controlling scheme, all the functions of a central bank should be performed by the government through its own treasury, which would stop the fabulous corporate income of central banks on issues, usury and profeteering. The mechanism to subordinate different states to "international bankers" through a system of embedded central banks is described in detail in the book called "The Invisible Hand" (Ralph Epperson, 1999). In particular, it gives a detailed description of the struggle to subordinate the United States, which in 1913 resulted in creation of a supranational controlling body in the form of a private corporation. To disguise it, it was not even called a central bank, but the Federal reserve, which did not change its essence. This system, as the author notes, "has fabulous interest benefits from all the money it creates out of nothing", and this is the essence and purpose of the Russian domestic Central Bank.
As soon as any state tries to encroach on this fiefdom of the international usurious mafia and its personal profit, as if by magic, somehow, this state's leaders get 'suddenly' replaced. In July 1963, the US President John F. Kennedy issued Executive Order No. 11-110, which allowed the US Government to print a state dollar. After the first 5 million of these dollars had been printed, the President was assassinated in November 1963, and this decree, which was not canceled and did not become invalid, has not yet been used by any of the subsequent US presidents.
The Russian Central Bank's management falsely explains the growth of loan interest by high rates of inflation and an increase in the volume of non-repaid loans, replacing the root cause with its consequences. It became clear that both the "root causes" are fully conditioned by the arbitrary unaffordable loan interest. In fact, the primary cause, the main generator of inflation is the loan interest, which directly affects the cost of production and inevitably raises prices many times, even when conducting elementary "buy-sell" operations, not to mention high-tech long-term capital turnover cycles.
The defeat of industry followed by corresponding state of inflation is achieved via zeroing the purchasing power of working capital, due to a price shock (as it was in 1991) and its compensation with credit resources at 60-200% (according to the practice of the 1990s) per annum. This ensures an unconditional transfer of purchasing power from the production sphere to the financial and speculative sphere in a shortest possible time. It is impossible for production to function in such conditions even theoretically.
This mechanism of destruction has not undergone any fundamental changes compared to the remote past. To confirm that, we quote from A. D. Nechvolodov's brochure "The Russian money", dated 1907: "...an unprecedented increase in the accounting percentage results in a strong constraint of all commercial and industrial activities, and if such order of things continues then it will inevitably cause collapse of many enterprises that could still successfully exist... To bring Russia out of the state of turmoil, first of all it is necessary to change its previous economic policy by the policy to develop its national productive forces."
Reducing the issue of own means of payment, compressing the money supply is a means to trigger external borrowing and to create maneuver room for the dollar financial pyramid. Since August 15, 1971, when the US gold reserve was almost exhausted, exchanging the dollar for gold was legally suspended, which meant the collapse of the gold standard. Our commodity weight, Russia's energy resources are currently ensuring the stability of the dollar, because they are sold for this currency. The fact that global dollar pyramid is doomed calls forth numerous projects to create regional currencies and global barter schemes. Unfortunately, all these developments are proposed within the framework of the same vicious schemes of the credit and financial system, and therefore are methodologically untenable. The most eloquent evidence of this is the "youngest" currency — the Euro, which is in fact an integral part of the euro-dollar pyramid, owned by the same owner, although different groups of managers. States that do not promptly assess the possible consequences of uncontrolled unsecured issuance of certain currencies may be left with pyramid tickets on a global scale, and this applies primarily to the population of Russia.
The initial fundamental principle to switch the country's financial resources to the development of production, as the only source of progress to prosperity, is the legislative prohibition and equating usury to theft. During the acute phase of the financial crisis, almost all countries, with the exception of some like Russia, switched to lending on an interest-free basis.
In Japan, there has never been a free loan interest rate, it did not exceed 0.5-1.5% per annum. Back in 1999, at the stage of increased competition with the United States, Japan decided to reduce the loan interest rate from 0.25% to 0.15% per annum. By mid-2003, the national average of actual loan interest was negative. In the concept of controlling adopted by Japan, banks are not loan-and-usury institutions, they act as investment companies. They get into the same boat with the industrialist and claim only a part of the profit that will be received from their joint activities in the form of specific income in industry. At the same time, everyone, including banks, receives only a part of what is actually created with their participation at the end of the production cycle.
Islamic banks and financial companies operating on Quranic principles do not have the right to receive anything in the form of interest income, since usury, receiving income outside the sphere of creation, as noted earlier, is condemned in Quran (in particular, Surah 2:275) and is considered a most serious sin. The Quranic worldview does not accept all other types of income of brokers, intermediaries and speculators that are not related to a socially useful result, since you are allowed to trade only what belongs to you.
Russia has everything to create a new global financial center on a fundamentally new crisis-free methodological basis. It is time to resolve the issue of legislative transition to the energy security standard of the payment unit and accordingly change the entire financial system and the practice of economic calculations. To do this, we need to understand such a concept as "price list invariant". The price list invariant is a real product, not a "virtual" one. It expresses the prices of all other products in accounting units. Modern national economy in its technological and organizational structure is such that, although any product can be chosen as an invariant of the price list, it is preferable to choose kW/h of electricity. This solution immediately "ties" all economic calculations to the general physical law of energy conservation, and the energy security standard gives metrological consistency to the system of measuring economic values, all control parameters of the credit and financial system. It is clear that this approach to organize the credit and financial system will be opposed by bankers-usurers, financial speculators, as well as representatives of government structures and officials controlled by them.
Instead of faceless tickets of central banks , which a state is not responsible for, it is necessary to issue treasury obligations, public money, firmly secured by the country's energy resources and domestic products produced on their basis. This will allow us to move to an equal exchange of goods, including international exchange. Only then will we be able to stop the global supranational deception, when countries give all their national wealth for 'green papers'. In order to move to an equal exchange of goods, we must establish practice to sell any energy carriers and simple Russian products abroad exclusively for the Russian energy ruble. So we have a mass of goods, which allows printing fundamentally different guaranteed, stable means of payment, instead of borrowing them at extortionate interest rates.
The current generation living in Russia, if you like, is destined from Above to bring a fundamentally new worldview, a fundamentally new Strategy for the Future for all Mankind, in order to prevent its inevitable global catastrophe in any other development scenarios. This mission is due to the fact that it is our generation that has seen the essence of usury, in the times of Yeltsin bringing it to an unheard-of 210% per annum. At the same time, social consequences that were previously invisible against the background of centuries are easily recognized. They first occurred in a short period of time, within the lifetime of a single generation. This generation is also exposed to the absurdity of the imposed social choice between capitalism and socialism. Both supposedly different systems are also completely discredited within the lifetime of a single generation. For, since 1986, the country, by virtue of the Law of Time, has virtually overcome an entire epoch, which previously would have taken centuries — the birth, flourishing and collapse of bourgeois liberalism. These ideas are discredited in the minds of millions of people, no matter how the media characterize this period.
To view the economy as a whole and any of its sections (4th precedence of the generalized means of controlling) from the standpoint of the new Concept, which is an alternative to the currently prevailing doctrine of "Deuteronomy-Isaiah", radically differs from the generally accepted one. Thus, if morality admits that usury, and obtaining income without creating something useful is accepted in society as a norm, then such a norm itself generates certain consequences that are perceived as economic postulates.
One of them, for example, boils down to the fact that an increase in the mass of money inevitably generates inflation. This is so if money is directed to consumption or if this additional money generates additional interest-bearing usurious income which is not related to productive labor, income from "buy-sell" operations on the stock market, directed to purchase real goods. But if usury is outlawed, and additionally issued money is used to build an enterprise producing products that are secured by effective demand, then with qualified management of production and financial flows, the increase in the mass of money and inflation will not have direct association but inversely proportional. The more money that meets the energy security standard of a payment unit, the more is production capacity, the higher is technological level of production, and the lower is inflation rate.
This phenomenon was observed in our country in the period 1947 - 1953, when the prices of everyday goods steadily declined as production developed. Dmitriy Mendeleev carried out a financial analysis, which showed that within the years 1795 - 1895, prices for the vast majority of goods steadily declined. For example, for wheat, they decreased by 2.2 times, for sugar-by 3.6 times, for iron and copper — by 2.6 and 2.7 times, respectively. On average, over 100 years, prices for all products have decreased by 1.7 times, and only three products have slightly increased in price (D.I. Mendeleev "With the thought of the Russian good. Selected economic works". Novosibirsk, Nauka, 1991. p. 99). At the same time, Mendeleev gives a quite logical explanation for the steady decline in prices, which, in the absence of a negative impact of the credit and financial system, was due to an increase in labor productivity and a decrease in transport costs because of more frequent use of water communications. So inflation is not determined by the mass of money, but by the quality of controlling.
You can create, if not in real life, at least on paper, a model of the economy with zero loan interest, and you will no longer have the problem of how to get bankers to transfer money from speculative operations to real production, because this, in addition to paying for services actually rendered, will be the only source of their possible income. In the same way, all other "unsolvable" problems of today will disappear, be it high-tech production and modernization of the country or stable pension fund, which withdraws up to 20% of the future pensioners income. Create a financial atmosphere equivalent to the one that D. I. Mendeleev analyzed and you, as evidenced by elementary calculations, will have a real opportunity to pay a lifetime pension in the amount of at least 100% of the average salary. Today, these funds are eventually pumped de facto into the credit and financial system via inflationary mechanism. It is the same with housing construction. If you decide to build an apartment under a 30-year mortgage loan scheme, then try to calculate how many apartments you will have to buy in favor of bankers.
It puzzles when the country's financial bloc on the one hand, proclaims modernization and inflation reduction, and on the other hand, allows for a percentage increase in energy tariffs to a disastrous level of 15% and bank lending at the same interest rates. After all, elementary mathematical calculations using the compound interest formula, when interest is accrued annually, including the previous percentage growth, show that in 20 years time the tariffs should increase by 16 times, and to produce competitive high-tech products is impossible in principle. The fact is that if you try to use metal, for example, in producing some wire, and then a transformer, a device, and some finished product, then at each stage you will increase the cost of the intermediate product through loan interest. In this case, the same compound interest formula will work, and you will get a percentage increase in price that is not acceptable for the market. That is, the price of goods through each of the intermediate enterprises will include the profit of banks, which in total can be comparable to the cost of the product itself, and with a long lending cycle, it can significantly exceed it. Therefore, the only mass business in Russia will continue to be metal trading, not finished products. We should move from talking about modernization and high technologies to creating a financial atmosphere that would allow us to start implementing these ideas in practice.
From a conceptual point of view, the whole bluff of the great combinators in terms of "market" energy reform becomes obvious, the unity of which creates the basis for the integrity of the country. With the tacit consent of the current economic science, we are talking about the electricity market, which in principle does not have any signs of a market commodity. A sign of market goods is the presence of replacement goods, interchangeability, difference in quality characteristics, and the ability to create inventory. Macaroni can be replaced with potatoes, meat with fish, but electricity does not have a substitute product, there is nothing to replace it with, it cannot be stored, it cannot be classified by class and quality, like goods on the automobile market. In no country in the world are electricity prices set spontaneously. This economic alphabet remains unclaimed by our reformist politicians and their consulting economists, as well as by the entire economic science which is still the basis for all professional education in the field of Economics and Finance.
The main instrument of international economic plunder that is ignored by economic science is the issue of so-called currencies, or simply paper. Some countries get it by pressing the button of the printing press, others get it for gold, oil, gas. Is this banal fraud incomprehensible to the financial bloc of the robbed countries?
Here is an artistic illustration of the ability to redistribute wealth in somebody's favor. Since ancient times, this skill is called chrematistics (the skill of creating wealth), which has nothing to do with Economics. And in order to prevent the elementary economic alphabet from occurring in the minds of common people, those who have mastered it are silenced or indiscriminately groaned. Here is an illustration of the understanding of Economics from the point of view of a global politician:
"What ensures the stability of the Soviet currency, if we mean, of course, an organized market, which is crucial in the country's trade, and not an unorganized market, which has only a subordinate value? Of course, not only gold reserves. The stability of the Soviet currency is ensured, first of all, by the huge amount of commodity masses in the hands of the state, which are allowed to trade at stable prices. Who among economists can deny that such security, which only exists in the USSR, is a more real guarantee of stable currency than any gold reserve? Will the economists of the capitalist countries ever understand, that they are completely confused with the theory of the gold reserve as the only way to ensure the stability of the currency?»
J. Stalin. Report "Results of the first five-year plan", 07.01.1933
At the moment, the leadership of the financial and economic bloc of Russia does not have such "deep economists", but the future belongs to the latter.