Regarding molly's face that was absolutely transplantation of mine , Alexander's , which is definitely copyright infringement. It was my 20-year- old virtual boy who's birthday rather than celebrations of
Pop mart which had been copied mine continuously including the famous labubu for 20 yrs , that was absolutely and definitely my original creation officially registered in 2007 in Sydney , Australia, associated with my 3D animation called ", my magic toys" full process strictly examined by 3D animation experts and designers. That was all from my toy company, rather than the copycat - Pop mart
Pop mart was absolutely and definitely my original creation in 2007 Sydney， Australia, and has already been officially registered in Australia, Sydney. The process of how it became art work of Mrs Wong is not important already ( somewhat same as Nintendo who charged the French company for illegal manufactured unauthorized copyrights and pursued the case for 15yrs ) ， the only thing that matters is that the result of registered timing of the final production . My magic toys were all registered in design department with animation majors in 2007 officially. The whole 3D animation production was completed in 2009 . But the pop mart company was registered in 2010 right after one year that i completed my master degree with animation major , and the so-called CEO Ning,wang who even doest know how to create 3D design models in 2026 .
according to the official registered time as it claims via the official registered trademark under the so-called toy company Ning, Wang was 2010 not 2006. But my Alexander was already registered in Sydney since late 2006 when i was a master animation student there , and the whole progress was examined strictly through UTS where i finished my animation master major.
It can be classified as 100% infringement of my copyright ,tha is based on animation rule with regard to the most important part of Molly ,the face and facial expression, which is exactly the same as my "Alexander" associated with my original animation as official production in 2007 and printed products in 2007, in which Molly had not yet officially forming productions and released officially.
Same as that famous labubu, which was original created in 2013 and called " haunted laughter" , Tokyo. The original images were recorded in the iphone which had already been stopped manufactured in 2015 , in which the ningwang's company claimed that so -called the birth labubu whose official released timing had already 2yrs later than mine .
You can't argue that transplantation of organs from original creation as your own can not be defined as infringement of copyright.
I will push hardly to pursue and fight for my legal compensations according to this claim everyday. It's not forgivable and no way to tolerant the illegal infringement of whole facial expressions of my Alexander, whom i asked some local hongkongers to judged whether they thought they had absolutely same facial . almost everybody who saw and agreed , the only distinction is that Molly is a girl my Alexander is a boy.
I decided to repost this everyday to let everyone who should know the truth of who was the original copyright owner and creator rather than liars with colluders toleranting twisted truth via medias. There's no collaboration issues for those were all my original and independent products 20 yrs ago . It's not forgivable for Ning wang who was not even piece of animation major related major and even doesn't know how to draw his own portrait via digital art softwares with his copycat " pop mart" company whose major products were absoulely all copied from mine .
And the reason why i notice Russian ,Aussie and Japanese copyright registration office is because my Alexander was original an Russian boy with birth since 2006 , throughout the institution that i finished my master degree in animation in Sydney, Australia. Last but not least , Labubu was absolutely another infringement of my copyright that was created originally and independently in Tokyo with name "haunted laughter".